DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112430
Detection of adrenal gland lesions on CT: Development and external validation of a deep-learning-based model.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
We wanted to develop an AI model for the detection of adrenal lesions on CT scans and validate the model on internal and external datasets.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The model was trained on 647 CT-scans covering the upper abdomen with at least one adrenal lesion. In the internal test dataset 142 consecutive adult patients (median 72 years, 56% female) with adrenal lesions were retrospectively included, while the external dataset included 50 patients with known lung tumors and adrenal lesions. Presence of a lesion was the reference and the prediction score by the model was the index. We evaluated sensitivity and specific at prespecified thresholds and performed ROC-analysis. We also tested for the influence of lesion size, sex, age, scanner type and scan protocol on accuracy using Fisher's exact test and did a false positive / negative analysis.
RESULTS
The model had a sensitivity and specificity in the internal test cohort of 91% (86%-95%) and 92% (86%-97%) and 95% (85%-99%) and 94% (81%-99%) in the external cohort. AUROC ranged between 0.89 and 1.0. There was a significant (p<0.001) lower accuracy in lesions below 1cm and above 4cm. False positive findings were significantly more often on the left (p=0.027) and false negative findings significantly more often on the right (p=0.035). Sex, age, scanner type and scan protocol did not significantly affect accuracy.
CONCLUSION
We developed a model for the detection of adrenal lesions on CT scans covering the upper abdomen. The model achieved a high sensitivity and specificity in an internal and an external validation dataset.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.