MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.304

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2014

Effect of the order of test diets on the accuracy and safety of swallowing studies.

Jung Se Hee, Kim Juyong, Jeong Hyeonghui, Lee Shi-Uk

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the order of test diets influences the results of swallowing studies with regard to their accuracy and safety.

METHODS

Subjects with suspected dysphagia underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and/or a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and repeated the study on the same day or within a week. The order of test diets comprised of two different sets: trial 1 with the fluid first and trial 2 with the semi-solid food first. Main outcome measurements were the modified penetration-aspiration scale (mPAS) and the pharyngeal residue severity scale (PRSS) for the vallecula and the pyriform sinus.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (44 men and 22 women, aged 65.0±15.0 years) were enrolled in this study. Forty-three subjects were evaluated with VFSS only and 23 with both VFSS and FEES. As a result of the swallowing studies, there was no significant difference in each chosen diet sequence regarding mPAS and PRSS. Furthermore, there was no difference regarding the duration of studies, rate of premature study termination, rate of abnormal findings in post-study chest X-ray, and rate of fever or pneumonia post-study.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy and safety of the swallowing studies do not rely on the order of test diets.

Для цитирования: Jung Se Hee, Kim Juyong, Jeong Hyeonghui, Lee Shi-Uk. Effect of the order of test diets on the accuracy and safety of swallowing studies.. Annals of rehabilitation medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.304.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.