MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.74204

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Should Mesh Plug Use Be Discontinued in Hernia Repair Practices?

Louis Mena, Grabill Nathaniel, Fang Jerrell, Okunlola Oluwasemilore, Chambers James

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Mesh plugs are commonly used in inguinal hernia repair due to their perceived efficacy in reducing recurrence rates. However, their use has been associated with significant complications, including mesh migration, chronic pain, infection, hernia recurrence, adhesions, and erosion into adjacent organs. This case series presents three patients who experienced complications from mesh plug migration post-hernia repair. The patients, aged 63, 82, and 90, presented with symptoms ranging from chronic pain and groin bulging to acute-onset pain and recurrent hernias. Diagnostic imaging revealed migrated mesh plugs adhered to critical structures such as the spermatic cord and small bowel. The surgical intervention involved robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques to excise the migrated mesh plugs and place the new mesh in the preperitoneal space. Postoperative outcomes were stable. A review of the literature supports our findings, emphasizing the multifactorial mechanisms behind mesh migration and its severe clinical implications. Given these risks, we recommend generally avoiding the use of mesh plugs in hernia repair, if possible. Instead, other mesh alternatives and improved fixation techniques should be considered to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of these complications.

Для цитирования: Louis Mena, Grabill Nathaniel, Fang Jerrell, Okunlola Oluwasemilore, Chambers James. Should Mesh Plug Use Be Discontinued in Hernia Repair Practices?. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74204.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.