MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2026.115388

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026

Intravaginal radiofrequency versus local estrogen and prasterone for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a comparative study of clinical outcomes.

Llaneza Iris Porcel, Parugues Beatriz Duplá, de la Noval Begoña Díaz, Aldecoa Álvarez M Belén, Doblas Paula Vigil, Chiminazzo Valentina, Llaneza Coto Ángel Plácido

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) causes vulvovaginal and urinary symptoms due to estrogen deficiency. While local estrogen therapy is a standard treatment, non-hormonal alternatives such as intravaginal radiofrequency (RF) are under investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of intravaginal RF with local estriol and prasterone in postmenopausal women with clinically significant GSM.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, quasi-experimental, non-randomized study with sequential allocation (2:2:1) to estriol, prasterone, or RF (three monthly sessions). Primary outcome was defined as favorable response in vaginal dryness, while secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and favorable response in: pruritus/pain, dyspareunia, vaginal cytology, pH, Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) score, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) score and urinary symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 146 women allocated, 131 completed follow-up (estriol n = 54; prasterone n = 52; RF n = 25). RF showed comparable outcomes in selected urinary endpoints, including recurrent urinary tract infections, nocturia, urinary incontinence, and patient satisfaction compared with estriol. In adjusted analyses controlling for baseline pollakiuria, prasterone was associated with higher odds of favorable response in vaginal dryness compared with RF (OR 7.50; 95% CI 2.22-25.32; p = 0.001). RF showed lower favorable-response proportions for vaginal dryness and vaginal cytology, although only the comparison with prasterone for vaginal dryness reached statistical significance in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

RF showed partial clinical effectiveness and may be considered a non-hormonal option for selected women, particularly when urinary symptoms are prominent or hormonal therapy is not suitable. However, local estriol and prasterone showed greater benefit for vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and epithelial outcomes.

Для цитирования: Llaneza Iris Porcel, Parugues Beatriz Duplá, de la Noval Begoña Díaz, Aldecoa Álvarez M Belén, Doblas Paula Vigil, Chiminazzo Valentina, Llaneza Coto Ángel Plácido. Intravaginal radiofrequency versus local estrogen and prasterone for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a comparative study of clinical outcomes.. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2026.115388.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.