MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2021/5535162

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in surgery · 2021

Rare Contents of an Internal Hernia through a Defect of the Broad Ligament of the Uterus.

Takahashi Masafumi, Yoshimitsu Masanori, Yano Takuya, Idani Hitoshi, Shiozaki Shigehiro, Okajima Masazumi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Herniation through a defect of the uterine broad ligament is a rare internal hernia that is difficult to diagnose definitively. Common hernia contents contain ileal loops. Herein, we report a rare case of internal herniation of both the ileum and fallopian tube through a defect of the broad ligament. A 52-year-old woman presented to our hospital with suprapubic pain and vomiting. She had a history of bowel obstruction following cesarean section. On abdominopelvic computed tomography, we suspected a closed-loop obstruction associated with bowel herniation in the right broad ligament. However, we could not identify an area of poor enhancement adjacent to distended small intestines. Emergency laparoscopic exploration revealed a viable ileal loop and incarcerated organ. Therefore, we switched to laparotomy that revealed the right fallopian tube as the ischemic organ. We reduced the hernia, resected necrotic right fallopian tube, and closed the defect of the broad ligament. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. Rare hernia contents might complicate preoperative clinical diagnosis. Laparoscopy is useful for establishing a definitive diagnosis and treating broad ligament hernias.

Для цитирования: Takahashi Masafumi, Yoshimitsu Masanori, Yano Takuya, Idani Hitoshi, Shiozaki Shigehiro, Okajima Masazumi. Rare Contents of an Internal Hernia through a Defect of the Broad Ligament of the Uterus.. Case reports in surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5535162.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.