MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111274

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2023

GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Huang Ping, Qiu Yuwei, Xu Ting, Sun Xiaoqiong, Lu Zhixing, Zhang Yunyun, Yu Jiangli, Wu Jingxiang, Su Diansan, Huang Zhenling

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

Videolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.

DESIGN

A multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Three comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.

PATIENTS: We included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.

MAIN

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a videolaryngoscope failed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.

Для цитирования: Huang Ping, Qiu Yuwei, Xu Ting, Sun Xiaoqiong, Lu Zhixing, Zhang Yunyun, Yu Jiangli, Wu Jingxiang, Su Diansan, Huang Zhenling. GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111274.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.