MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jog.70427

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026

Adhesive Versus Spatial Anatomical Distortion Determines Energy Device Performance in Complex Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Güven Cenk Mustafa, Özgür Şebnem, Uysal Dilek

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the type of anatomical distortion-spatial or adhesive-determines the relative performance of the energy device in complex total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: A total of 167 women who underwent complex TLH between 2018 and 2025 were included. Cases were classified according to intraoperatively confirmed distortion type as spatial (uterine enlargement), adhesive (previous cesarean delivery or endometriosis), or combined.

INTERVENTIONS: TLH performed with conventional bipolar electrosurgery (CBP, n = 94) or LigaSure (LG, n = 73). Device selection was based on real-time availability.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Primary outcome was operative time. Overall operative time (136 ± 18 vs. 140 ± 17 min, p = 0.761), hemoglobin change, and length of hospital stay were comparable between groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between device type and distortion subgroup (F (1,90) = 18.0, p < 0.001). In the spatial distortion subgroup, LG was associated with shorter operative time (90 ± 23 vs. 110 ± 17 min, p = 0.004). In the adhesive distortion subgroup, CBP outperformed LG (140 ± 23 vs. 155 ± 19 min, p = 0.003). Multivariable regression confirmed that the device-distortion interaction remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders (B = 18.9, p < 0.001). Bladder injury was more frequent in the LG group (8.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.031), exclusively in patients with prior cesarean delivery. All conversions to laparotomy occurred in the spatial distortion subgroup, with no significant difference between devices (4.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.961).

CONCLUSION

Device efficiency in complex TLH is determined by the type of anatomical distortion. LG offers operative advantages when complexity is defined by uterine enlargement, whereas CBP electrosurgery is superior in the presence of adhesive disease. These findings support anatomy-driven device selection in complex TLH.

Для цитирования: Güven Cenk Mustafa, Özgür Şebnem, Uysal Dilek. Adhesive Versus Spatial Anatomical Distortion Determines Energy Device Performance in Complex Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/jog.70427.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.