MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12659/ajcr.933075

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of case reports · 2021

Recurrent Epistaxis and Unilateral Intranasal Mass in A Teenager.

Bradshaw Brad, Ulualp Seckin O, Rajaram Veena, Liu Christopher

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND Epistaxis in children is a common problem encountered in outpatient clinics and emergency departments. A wide variety of conditions may cause recurrent epistaxis in children. We describe clinical, radiologic, and histologic features of a lobular capillary hemangioma presenting as a rapidly growing intranasal mass in a child with recurrent epistaxis. CASE REPORT A 16-year-old male presented with a 2-month history of recurrent unilateral epistaxis requiring multiple visits to the emergency department. The child had nasal obstruction, snoring, no recurrent sinus infections, no anosmia nor hyposmia, no weight loss, no night sweats, no fever, no decreased activity, and no easy bruising. He denied any history of local trauma. On physical examination, a fleshy violaceous mass was found, protruding from and obliterating the right nasal cavity. Magnetic resonance imaging documented an avidly enhancing mass centered at the right nasal vestibule. Upon resection, histologic evaluation indicated a pyogenic granuloma. At the 2-month followup, the surgical site was healed with no evidence of recurrent lesion. CONCLUSIONS Lobular capillary hemangioma, although uncommon, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrent epistaxis and intranasal mass in children.

Для цитирования: Bradshaw Brad, Ulualp Seckin O, Rajaram Veena, Liu Christopher. Recurrent Epistaxis and Unilateral Intranasal Mass in A Teenager.. The American journal of case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.933075.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.