MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14712/18059694.2017.21

Медицинская библиотека · Acta medica (Hradec Kralove) · 2008

Incidence of accessory phrenic nerve and its clinical significance: a cadaveric study.

Nayak Soubhagya R, Krishnamurthy Ashwin, Prabhu Latha V, Ramanathan Lakshmi, Pai Mangala M, Potu Bhagath Kumar, Das Srijit

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The description of accessory phrenic nerve (APN) in the standard textbooks and available literature is vague and sometimes limited to few lines. The incidence of APN varies a great deal from 17.6 % to 80.9 % in the available literature. The aim of the present study was to calculate the incidence and variation of APN in Indian population.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Forty five adult formalin-fixed cadavers (35 male, 10 female; 90 sides) used for gross anatomy dissection for undergraduates; during the 2 year period 2006-2007 were considered. Findings were recorded at different stages of the dissection.

RESULTS

Out of 90 body sides studied, the APN was present in 48 sides (53.3 %). In 17 of the above sides the APN was confined to the cervical region (Cervical type) and in 31 sides the APN entered the thorax (Thoracic type), all anterior to the subclavian vein (SV). In eleven specimens the APN was found bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of APN, with its course and relation to the various structures in cervical and thoracic region will help the surgeons while performing internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting and other radical neck surgery.

Для цитирования: Nayak Soubhagya R, Krishnamurthy Ashwin, Prabhu Latha V, Ramanathan Lakshmi, Pai Mangala M, Potu Bhagath Kumar, Das Srijit. Incidence of accessory phrenic nerve and its clinical significance: a cadaveric study.. Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). 2008. DOI: 10.14712/18059694.2017.21.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.