MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tjog.2026.03.025

Медицинская библиотека · Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2026

Uterine lithiasis triggered by an intrauterine contraceptive device: A case report and literature review.

Ikeda Akihiro, Iida Yuki, Ito Masayuki, Tsuji Keisuke, Nakamura Terukazu, Tsudo Toshiyuki, Kato Takashi

СтатьяКлинический случайОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Uterine lithiasis is an extremely rare condition. Although bladder stone formation associated with intrauterine devices (IUDs) has occasionally been described, no previous cases of uterine calculus have been reported in the literature.

CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 78-year-old Japanese woman who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding and abdominal distention. Imaging revealed calcifications extending from the cervix to the bladder, indicating a vesicouterine fistula. A uterine calculus containing a Y-shaped IUD and a bladder stone was identified. The patient underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, bladder stone removal, and fistula repair, which resulted in an uneventful recovery.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the IUD perforated the bladder, served as a nidus for bladder stone formation, and subsequently led to the development of uterine calculi via the fistula. This case highlights the importance of IUD monitoring, timely removal, and clinician awareness of rare complications such as uterine calculi.

Для цитирования: Ikeda Akihiro, Iida Yuki, Ito Masayuki, Tsuji Keisuke, Nakamura Terukazu, Tsudo Toshiyuki, Kato Takashi. Uterine lithiasis triggered by an intrauterine contraceptive device: A case report and literature review.. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2026.03.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.