International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema after lobectomy: Two case reports with different courses.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shindo Yuki, Ishihara Hiroya, Morita Takuro, Sato Kiyoshi, Hanaoka Nobuharu, Katsumata Takahiro
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema after lobectomy is uncommon and is typically caused by minor air leakage from the residual lung; however, the development of a contralateral pneumothorax is particularly rare, and if missed, it can be fatal.
PRESENTATION OF CASES: Two cases of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema occurring after a lobectomy in a 77-year-old man and a 78-year-old man are reported here. The former received conservative treatment, while the latter he developed a pneumothorax on the side contralateral to the surgical site after readmission. Chest tube drainage was then performed.
DISCUSSION: The occurrence of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema after lobectomy is not uncommon. Conservative management is often sufficient if no pneumothorax is present, as in Case 1. However, in Case 2, pneumothorax occurred on the contralateral side due to a minor air leakage, which is an unusual complication. Generally, a pneumothorax of the residual lung on the surgical side occurs earlier than a pneumothorax on the contralateral lung. The earlier onset on the contralateral side in Case 2 suggests that the pressure threshold for rupturing the contralateral mediastinal pleura and/or alveoli may have been lower than that for collapsing the residual lung on the operative side. We recommend that pulmonologists should also monitor the contralateral side and that follow-up radiographic examinations should be performed a few hours later.
CONCLUSION: Pulmonologists should monitor the side contralateral to the surgical site, even if the emphysema is caused by a postoperative minor air leakage.
PRESENTATION OF CASES: Two cases of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema occurring after a lobectomy in a 77-year-old man and a 78-year-old man are reported here. The former received conservative treatment, while the latter he developed a pneumothorax on the side contralateral to the surgical site after readmission. Chest tube drainage was then performed.
DISCUSSION: The occurrence of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema after lobectomy is not uncommon. Conservative management is often sufficient if no pneumothorax is present, as in Case 1. However, in Case 2, pneumothorax occurred on the contralateral side due to a minor air leakage, which is an unusual complication. Generally, a pneumothorax of the residual lung on the surgical side occurs earlier than a pneumothorax on the contralateral lung. The earlier onset on the contralateral side in Case 2 suggests that the pressure threshold for rupturing the contralateral mediastinal pleura and/or alveoli may have been lower than that for collapsing the residual lung on the operative side. We recommend that pulmonologists should also monitor the contralateral side and that follow-up radiographic examinations should be performed a few hours later.
CONCLUSION: Pulmonologists should monitor the side contralateral to the surgical site, even if the emphysema is caused by a postoperative minor air leakage.