The journal of sexual medicine · 2025
Promoting women's genital self-image with vulva photographs and information about genital appearance and function: an online experiment.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gonin-Spahni Stefanie, Schmuki Maria, Brandner Lucca M, Borgmann Michèle, Haupt Clemens A, Inauen Jennifer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Women with more negative genital self-image are more likely to experience sexual dysfunction, less likely to protect themselves from sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancy, and more likely to consider labiaplasty.
AIM: This study investigates whether women's genital self-image can be promoted via exposure to natural vulva diversity and information about genital appearance and function.
METHODS: An online experiment was conducted as a two-arm randomized controlled trial including a vulva photographs only, photographs and information, and a control condition. Participants were 563 women aged 18-68 years (M = 27.6, SD = 8.3).
OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the Genital Self-Image Scale; secondary outcomes included the Female Sexual Function Index, sexual health behavior, and interest in genital plastic surgery.
RESULTS: Results indicated a significant main effect of time. Genital self-image increased significantly in all conditions immediately after the intervention (all p < .01, all partial η2 ≥ .03). In the group with vulva photographs, this increase remained stable at 2-week follow-up (p < .05, partial η2 = .02). Only women in the vulva photographs and information group showed a significantly more positive genital self-image at 8-week follow-up (p < .01, partial η2 = .05). Confirming the experimental effect, we found a significant group x time interaction (p < .001, partial η2 = .015). Planned contrasts indicated a significant group difference in genital self-image in the intervention groups vs. controls immediately after the intervention (p < .01, d = .53) and at the 2-week follow-up (p = .042, d = .41). No group differences were found at the 8-week follow-up (p < .60). The combined condition of photographs with information was not superior to photographs only at any time point. There were no effects on secondary outcomes (all p > .20).
CLINICAL TRANSLATION: The results underscore that women's genital self-image can be improved rapidly and cost-effectively with education.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study is the first to examine the changeability of genital self-image in a large convenience sample using an experimental design. The intervention effect could only be shown in the short term. However, the effect was particularly impressive given that women's genital self-image was relatively positive prior to the intervention. The results may not generalize to women with a less positive genital self-image or those considering labiaplasty.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to photographs of natural vulvas with or without information about genital diversity and function is a useful tool for improving genital self-image in adult women, potentially benefiting sexual health and well-being.
AIM: This study investigates whether women's genital self-image can be promoted via exposure to natural vulva diversity and information about genital appearance and function.
METHODS: An online experiment was conducted as a two-arm randomized controlled trial including a vulva photographs only, photographs and information, and a control condition. Participants were 563 women aged 18-68 years (M = 27.6, SD = 8.3).
OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the Genital Self-Image Scale; secondary outcomes included the Female Sexual Function Index, sexual health behavior, and interest in genital plastic surgery.
RESULTS: Results indicated a significant main effect of time. Genital self-image increased significantly in all conditions immediately after the intervention (all p < .01, all partial η2 ≥ .03). In the group with vulva photographs, this increase remained stable at 2-week follow-up (p < .05, partial η2 = .02). Only women in the vulva photographs and information group showed a significantly more positive genital self-image at 8-week follow-up (p < .01, partial η2 = .05). Confirming the experimental effect, we found a significant group x time interaction (p < .001, partial η2 = .015). Planned contrasts indicated a significant group difference in genital self-image in the intervention groups vs. controls immediately after the intervention (p < .01, d = .53) and at the 2-week follow-up (p = .042, d = .41). No group differences were found at the 8-week follow-up (p < .60). The combined condition of photographs with information was not superior to photographs only at any time point. There were no effects on secondary outcomes (all p > .20).
CLINICAL TRANSLATION: The results underscore that women's genital self-image can be improved rapidly and cost-effectively with education.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study is the first to examine the changeability of genital self-image in a large convenience sample using an experimental design. The intervention effect could only be shown in the short term. However, the effect was particularly impressive given that women's genital self-image was relatively positive prior to the intervention. The results may not generalize to women with a less positive genital self-image or those considering labiaplasty.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to photographs of natural vulvas with or without information about genital diversity and function is a useful tool for improving genital self-image in adult women, potentially benefiting sexual health and well-being.