BMC oral health · 2026
Autonomous dental implant robotics for transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation: workflow development and clinical trueness evaluation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qian Jiakang, Zi-Zheng Wang, Teng Xinya, Qu Xiaohui, Qu Ying, Zou Derong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the trueness and safety of an autonomous dental implant robotic system (ADIRS) for transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation (TSFE), to compare outcomes between flat and sloped sinus floor morphologies, and to summarize a morphology-specific operative workflow.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort included 11 patients (12 implants) who underwent ADIRS-assisted TSFE between June 2024 and June 2025. Planned and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography datasets were superimposed to quantify global deviations at the coronal (platform) and apical levels and angular deviation. Intraoperative endoscopic inspection and the Valsalva maneuver were used to detect Schneiderian membrane perforations.
RESULTS: Mean global deviations at the coronal and apical levels were 0.58 ± 0.38 mm (range 0.17-1.63) and 0.64 ± 0.35 mm (range 0.37-1.62), respectively, and the mean angular deviation was 1.19 ± 0.50° (range 0.56-2.43). No Schneiderian membrane perforations or other intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Trueness metrics did not differ significantly between the flat (n = 7) and sloped (n = 5) groups.
CONCLUSION: ADIRS-assisted TSFE achieved submillimeter positional trueness with reliable protection of the sinus membrane in posterior maxillary implant placement, supporting its use as a standardized, minimally invasive sinus augmentation protocol.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort included 11 patients (12 implants) who underwent ADIRS-assisted TSFE between June 2024 and June 2025. Planned and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography datasets were superimposed to quantify global deviations at the coronal (platform) and apical levels and angular deviation. Intraoperative endoscopic inspection and the Valsalva maneuver were used to detect Schneiderian membrane perforations.
RESULTS: Mean global deviations at the coronal and apical levels were 0.58 ± 0.38 mm (range 0.17-1.63) and 0.64 ± 0.35 mm (range 0.37-1.62), respectively, and the mean angular deviation was 1.19 ± 0.50° (range 0.56-2.43). No Schneiderian membrane perforations or other intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Trueness metrics did not differ significantly between the flat (n = 7) and sloped (n = 5) groups.
CONCLUSION: ADIRS-assisted TSFE achieved submillimeter positional trueness with reliable protection of the sinus membrane in posterior maxillary implant placement, supporting its use as a standardized, minimally invasive sinus augmentation protocol.