MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(25)02435-3

Медицинская библиотека · Lancet (London, England) · 2026

Lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (TRANSCEND FL): primary analysis results from the global, multicohort, single-arm, phase 2 study.

Palomba M Lia, Schuster Stephen J, Karmali Reem, Skarbnik Alan P, Abramson Jeremy S, Ardeshna Kirit, Borchmann Peter, Hill Brian T, García-Sancho Alejandro Martin, Marcacci Gianpaolo, Rapoport Aaron P, Cartron Guillaume, Fleury Isabelle, Izutsu Koji, Kamdar Manali, Mielke Stephan, Barbui Anna Maria, Ortega Juan Luis Reguera, Nastoupil Loretta J, Ahmed Sairah, Bar Merav, Diaz Lizbeth, Furustrand Ulrika, Diab Victoria, Vedal Min, Avilion Ariel, Kumar Jinender, Nishii Rina, Colicino Silvia, Morschhauser Franck

СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Effective treatments with deep and durable responses for relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are lacking. The objective of the primary analysis from the MZL cohort of TRANSCEND FL was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel.

METHODS

In this phase 2, single-arm, multicohort study, patients from 30 sites in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Japan with relapsed or refractory MZL who had at least two previous lines of systemic therapy were eligible to receive lisocabtagene maraleucel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells). Bridging therapy was allowed. The primary endpoint was overall response rate per independent review committee by CT by use of Lugano 2014 criteria (null hypothesis ≤50%). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04245839, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS: Of 77 leukapheresed patients recruited between November 11, 2020, and August 24, 2023, 67 received lisocabtagene maraleucel and 66 were efficacy evaluable. MZL subtypes included nodal (n=32 [48%]), splenic (n=18 [27%]), and extranodal-mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (n=17 [25%]). Median (IQR) previous lines of systemic therapy was 3 (2-4). Median on-study follow-up was 24·1 months. The primary endpoint was met, with an overall response rate of 95% (n=63; 95% CI, 87·3-99·1; one-sided p<0·0001). All patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome or neurological events occurred in three (4%) patients each (no grade 4-5 events). 11 (16%) patients had grade ≥3 infections: six (9%) patients during the 90-day treatment-emergent period and seven (10%) during the post-treatment-emergent period.

INTERPRETATION: In patients with relapsed or refractory MZL, lisocabtagene maraleucel showed high rates of durable responses. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals. These results support lisocabtagene maraleucel as a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory MZL.

FUNDING: Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Для цитирования: Palomba M Lia, Schuster Stephen J, Karmali Reem, Skarbnik Alan P, Abramson Jeremy S, Ardeshna Kirit, Borchmann Peter, Hill Brian T, García-Sancho Alejandro Martin, Marcacci Gianpaolo, Rapoport Aaron P, Cartron Guillaume, Fleury Isabelle, Izutsu Koji, Kamdar Manali, Mielke Stephan, Barbui Anna Maria, Ortega Juan Luis Reguera, Nastoupil Loretta J, Ahmed Sairah, Bar Merav, Diaz Lizbeth, Furustrand Ulrika, Diab Victoria, Vedal Min, Avilion Ariel, Kumar Jinender, Nishii Rina, Colicino Silvia, Morschhauser Franck. Lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (TRANSCEND FL): primary analysis results from the global, multicohort, single-arm, phase 2 study.. Lancet (London, England). 2026. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(25)02435-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.