INTRODUCTION
Global tobacco use among women of childbearing age
Around the world, 1.3 billion people use tobacco products, with low- and middle-income nations accounting for 80% of all users 1 . Nicotine, a component of tobacco, is a highly addictive chemical compound, making it difficult to halt the use of any tobacco product containing nicotine 2 . Other potentially hazardous compounds also exist in tobacco or are produced when burned 2 . Tobacco can be smoked, chewed, or snuffed. Cigarettes, cigars, bidis, and kreteks are all forms of smoked tobacco products 2 . Some individuals may use a pipe or hookah (waterpipe) to smoke loose tobacco 2 . Certain organizations, including the US Food and Drug Administration, classify e-cigarettes as tobacco products 3 , 4 . In response to concerns surrounding vaping-related lung injuries, some individuals may seek novel nicotine delivery methods like heat-not-burn devices, which, although emitting lower levels of harmful chemicals compared to traditional cigarettes, still pose potential cardiovascular health risks due to the presence of substances such as nicotine, particulate matter, benzene, acrolein, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in their emissions 5 . With the use of smoked tobacco, there is the potential for secondhand smoke exposure, wherein people who do not smoke are exposed to the smoke produced from the burning tip of a cigarette (or other smoked tobacco product) as well as the smoke exhaled by the smoker, as the vapor that smokers exhale typically includes nicotine 3 .
The Lancet Global Health research revealed that smoking while pregnant remains a common practice. Of the 174 countries examined, 29 countries, constituting 17% of the total, had a prevalence of smoking during pregnancy exceeding 10%. Additionally, the study found that over 70% of expectant mothers who smoked during their pregnancies were habitual daily smokers 6 . The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in 54 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) between 2001 and 2012, which included 58922 pregnant women (aged 15–49 years), found that the prevalence of any tobacco use (smoking and smokeless use) among pregnant women in LMICs was 26% (95% CI: 18–36); South-East Asia had the highest prevalence (51%) and Africa had the lowest at 20% (range: 12–29) 7 . The combined prevalence of current tobacco use among pregnant women varied by location, from 0% (range: 0–3) in Africa to 3% (range: 1–12) in the Western Pacific 7 . Indigenous pregnant women in the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, often consume tobacco at rates two to three times greater than non-indigenous pregnant women 3 , 8 . Additionally, socioeconomically poor women, women with lower education level, and women with many children are more likely to smoke during pregnancy 3 , 9 . Along with increased baseline smoking, having a spouse or household member who smokes, being significantly exposed to secondhand smoke, consuming alcohol before or during pregnancy, and experiencing depression, have all been demonstrated to reduce by half the likelihood of smoking cessation while pregnant 3 , 10 .
Harmful effects of tobacco use on maternal and child health
Smoking and smokeless tobacco harm expectant mothers and their unborn children 3 . Congenital disabilities, stillbirths, preterm births, and infant fatalities have all been linked to maternal smoking or passive smoking exposure during pregnancy 11 . Due to its detrimental effects on fetal development and pregnant women’s health and well-being, tobacco use during pregnancy is a significant public health issue 12 . Previous research has shown that tobacco use during pregnancy can significantly increase the risks of stillbirth, congenital disorders/disabilities, premature birth, and low-weight birth 11 , 13 . Children who live with smokers are more likely to acquire respiratory illnesses, including bronchiolitis and pneumonia. They are also more likely to have middle ear illnesses and develop asthma, which can result in hospitalization. They are also more prone to death before turning five. Furthermore, maternal smoking during pregnancy may be a risk factor for retinoblastoma and certain childhood brain tumors. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report, children exposed to tobacco smoke early in life also have more behavioral issues and perform worse academically 11 . Furthermore, maternal smoking during pregnancy is significantly associated with having a detrimental effect on oral health. WHO’s recent toolkit, for oral health professionals to deliver brief tobacco interventions, discussed that active and passive exposure to tobacco smoke is significantly associated with oral cancer, leukoplakia, periodontal diseases, dental caries, and tooth loss. Smokers are 2 to 4 times at a higher risk of periodontitis, which was also shown to be positively associated with adverse birth outcomes 14 - 18 . It can also affect the oral health of the baby: maternal smoking during pregnancy can affect tooth development, such as missing teeth in offspring, and is linked to dental caries in children 13 , 14 .
In a systematic review conducted in 2021, 64 studies were examined to investigate the correlation between maternal smoking during pregnancy and 46 different health conditions 19 . The findings indicated a significantly increased risk association with seven health conditions 19 . Among these, the most substantial risks were observed in cases of spontaneous miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy 19 . No level of fetal tobacco exposure can be considered safe. Smoking during pregnancy can potentially harm the developing fetus, particularly affecting crucial organs like the lungs and brain. Smoking primarily contributes to mortality, disability, and illnesses among newborns 20 . One in five babies born to smoking mothers has a low-weight birth 21 . Moreover, smoking during pregnancy, as well as exposure to secondhand smoke during pregnancy, has been associated with an elevated risk of stillbirth, and both significantly heighten the probability of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) (OR=2.98; 95% CI: 2.51– 3.54) 22 , 23 . Even if no apparent complications affect the fetus or newborn, smoking during pregnancy can still adversely affect the child’s long-term health and development. A systematic review of 79 prospective studies revealed a significant increase in the risk of asthma, ranging 21–85%, with the most pronounced effect observed in children aged <2 years (OR=1.85; 95% CI: 1.35–2.53) 24 . In a prospective cohort study involving 9432 children born in Finland and tracked until aged 15–16 years, 4462 (47.3%) of them became daily smokers during adolescence, finding that maternal smoking during pregnancy had a notable impact on the likelihood of offspring smoking as adolescents 25 .
In several countries, smokeless tobacco is more socially acceptable than smoked tobacco among women and is frequently less expensive than cigarettes 3 , 7 , 26 . Smokeless tobacco items include snuff, snus, dip, and regular chewing tobacco. In 21 of the 45 countries with data available, smokeless tobacco was the predominant tobacco product used by pregnant women, according to a recent study focusing on LMICs 3 , 7 . Using smokeless tobacco while pregnant increases the risk of stillbirth, premature birth, or having an underweight baby. The South-East Asian region had the highest frequency of current smokeless tobacco use among pregnant women (26%), whereas Europe had the lowest prevalence (1%) 7 .
E-cigarettes and other nicotine devices are also dangerous to use during pregnancy, despite their aerosols generally containing fewer hazardous components than cigarette smoke 27 . Moreover, some flavoring used in e-cigarettes may be toxic to an unborn child 27 . Exposure to secondhand smoke during pregnancy is a significant issue.
Tobacco prevention and cessation efforts for women in childbearing age
The likelihood of ceasing smoking during pregnancy and the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy vary greatly among subpopulations. While many pregnant women are determined to quit smoking and are interested in getting help, they frequently encounter significant barriers, such as a lack of appropriate support from doctors and their healthcare and social environment, but also at an individual level 28 - 33 .
Pregnancy tobacco prevention and cessation programs have received extensive attention from researchers in high-income nations; however, the work mainly targets individual healthcare providers to support and empower women to change their behavior during pregnancy 34 . Although pregnant women are a highly vulnerable target group, there is a close connection and implicit responsibility for the child through the mother. Therefore, it is necessary to create a comprehensive framework to serve women of childbearing age for tobacco use prevention and cessation. A supportive health provider, social environment, and structural determinants are needed to ensure effectiveness 34 . Therefore, it is crucial to design and execute smoking cessation strategies that prevent these risk factors’ detrimental effects, primarily as they affect children’s health and development 12 .
However, tobacco prevention and cessation measures explicitly tailored to women of reproductive age are not consistently included in maternal health and oral health initiatives and clinical recommendations for primary care and dental practitioners to adapt in their clinical practices. Regarding the contexts, practices, and target healthcare workforces, national maternal tobacco cessation programs vary significantly from country to country. To establish future maternal tobacco control frameworks to facilitate cross-national learning, this scoping review and analysis aims to comprehend the fundamental components of such frameworks.
The objectives of this scoping review are: 1) to analyze the body of literature in a systematic way using specific criteria and databases to search maternal prevention and cessation frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies at the international and national level; 1) to focus on extracting key information from identified literature to analyze common core elements in such frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies (e.g. scientific evidence, target workforce, best practices); and 3) to categorize and determine the various resources into overarching themes of tobacco prevention and cessation frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies for women of childbearing age across the globe to identify gaps in the literature and propose future initiatives and policy development strategies.
METHODS
The JBI methodology will be adapted for this scoping review 35 in combination with the PRISMA protocols and checklists. The protocol follows the PRISMA-P checklist for developing and reporting review protocols. The Scoping Review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA): Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR and flowchart) 25 , 26 . The checklist covers recommended items to be addressed in the scoping review. We will use a flow diagram for a transparent report of the information flow in the scoping review 25 , 26 . The flow diagram depicts the flow of information through the different phases of our review. It maps out the number of records identified, included, or excluded, with the reasons for exclusion. We used the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) model to inform the research question, the search strategy, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria ( Table 1 ).
Table 1
Eligibility criteria based on PICO
| PICO model | Concept covered | Eligibility criteria |
| Population | Women of reproductive age (15–49 years) and pregnant mothers with exposure to different types of tobacco [smoking smokeless/chewable tobacco, e-cigarettes, secondhand/thirdhand smoke, snuff, snus, dig, heated tobacco (HNBPs), bidi, etc.] | Articles are eligible that report on: Women aged 15–49 years; Pregnant woman; and/or The general population as it might be that only the article reports a framework that addresses the entire population and does not explicitly address women. In this case, it is checked manually whether women, as defined under a) and b) above, are mentioned as a specific target group in the framework. |
| Intervention | Frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies at the international and national level addressing tobacco prevention and cessation | Articles that report on frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, or strategies that are population-based interventions with elements of: International-level or national-level approaches; Focus on maternal tobacco prevention and cessation; and Aim to prevent and reduce tobacco consumption in pregnant women or women of reproductive age. |
| Comparator | Not applicable | |
| Outcome | Every outcome reported in the studies regarding the effects of the frameworks, guidelines, and strategies | No eligibility criterion, but any effect that is reported is extracted. |
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Articles will be eligible for inclusion if they adhere to the criteria shown in Table 1 , with all study designs applicable.
Exclusion criteria
Research interventions aimed at individual behavioral changes will be excluded as the level of impact must be international or national population-based approaches.
Languages
The search encompasses English and non-English literature, as journals published in the national language often provide English titles and abstracts to facilitate indexing by literature databases. In the subsequent full-text screening process, studies not published in English will be omitted and documented to track the count of publications excluded due to language limitations.
Information sources and search
Databases
The electronic bibliographic databases that will be searched for this study include MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Global Health (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE for the period January 2015 to August 2023. The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s, and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030) was published in 2015, and serves as a roadmap for ending all preventable maternal, newborn and child deaths, including stillbirths, by 2030 and improving their overall health and well-being 36 . Their evidence-based health interventions for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health include pre-pregnancy detection and management of risk factors such as tobacco 36 . Therefore, we chose our search period from 2015 and onward. The age range 15–49 years was based on the Demographic Health Surveys 7 . The search strategy for MEDLINE is available in the Supplementary file. The search terms will be adapted for each bibliographic database in combination with the controlled vocabulary and keywords, where these are available.
Search strategy
Search string
An iterative technique will be used to develop the search strategy 28 adapted from JBI’s three-step approach. A preliminary search has been done in PubMed based on an initial set of key terms. The retrieved articles were reviewed regarding their topical fit. Keywords and synonyms were identified from the retrieved articles and used to revise the search strategy. The final search string will be adapted to other databases. Due to capacity, the grey literature search must be limited to 100 hits. Cohen’s kappa will be calculated to assess the agreement between the two raters. High rates are important to ensuring the validity and generalizability of research findings.
Grey literature
Grey literature searches will be conducted on Google Scholar with the following search terms: pregnancy, reproductive age, frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, strategies, tobacco prevention, and tobacco cessation. The first 100 hits are screened regarding the inclusion criteria.
Additional search
The results list is complemented by an expert survey among members of the WFPHA Oral Health, Tobacco Control, and Women, Adolescent, and Children’s Workgroup to identify any significant maternal oral health and tobacco control frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, or strategies. This is necessary to identify frameworks, guidelines, and recommendations at the national level that may not have been identified in the systematic and grey literature search. For this purpose, the experts receive a list of the frameworks identified per country with the request to review them and, if necessary, to add country-specific or internationally valid frameworks. The supplemented frameworks are included in the data extraction and added to the flow chart marked accordingly. For the data extraction the experts who have reported the framework are asked to carry out the data extraction. Earlier involvement of the experts in the screening process for non-English literature is impossible due to their limited resources.
Data management and screening process
The hits found are exported from the databases and imported into Endnote. EndNote, a program for managing references, and Covidence, an online screening management application, will be used to manage the screening process. In EndNote, duplicate entries will be eliminated, first within each database and then across databases. The de-duplicated dataset is imported into Covidence. Covidence will be utilized for managing the title/abstract and the full-text screening. Titles, abstracts, and full texts will be screened regarding the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent screeners. All conflicts are discussed. If no agreement is reached then: 1) the article will be transferred to the full-text screening within the context of the title/abstract screening; and 2) in the case of conflicts in the full-text screening, conflicts are resolved by discussion. If no agreement can be reached, a third person not involved in the screening process will be consulted.
Data extraction
Data will be extracted into a priori and pre-tested extraction sheets. The extraction sheet used for this purpose will be developed in an iterative process and pre-tested beforehand. A preliminary extraction table covering, for example, details of the article (author, year, country), circumstances, populations, problems, and recommendations is shown in Table 2 . The data extraction sheet will be pre-tested on three randomly selected included studies and adjusted if necessary. Two authors will independently extract 10% of the data to ensure quality. If any uncertainties arise, a discussion will be sought within the author group.
Table 2
Preliminary data extraction sheet
| Details of reference | Title | |
| Authors | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Year of publication | ||
| Journal | ||
| Volume | ||
| Issue | ||
| Pages | ||
| DOI | ||
| Circumstance | Tobacco uses 1 (direct) | Cigarette Smokeless tobacco E-cigarette Other forms of smoking |
| Tobacco uses 2 (indirect) | Secondhand smoke Thirdhand smoke | |
| WHO Region | African Region, Region of the Americas, South-East Asia Region, European Region, Eastern Mediterranean Region, Western Pacific Region | |
| Level of frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, strategies | Multi-countries (international) National | |
| Country/countries | ||
| Population | Pregnant Women | Yes or No |
| Women of childbearing age (15–49 years) | Yes or No | |
| Problem | Problem(s) described? | Yes or No |
| Barriers to accessing tobacco counseling mentioned? | Yes or No | |
| Barriers to implementing tobacco counseling mentioned? | Yes or No | |
| Recommendation | Intervention method mentioned? | Yes or No |
| Intervention included in the guideline/strategy/recommendation | Examples: Referral Counselling Policy implementation Insurance coverage for tobacco counselling Community engagement Healthcare workforce training Collaboration with non-traditional workforces, such as community health workers, dentists, and others Integration into primary care Integration in non-clinical settings Health communication and health education Digital health Other | |
| Is the recommended intervention evidence-based? | Yes or No If yes – provide the source of evidence | |
| If the intervention was implemented, was it evaluated? | Yes or No Examples: Methods to evaluate provider’s competence in providing smoking cessation counseling to pregnant women Methods to evaluate women’s tobacco prevention or cessation outcomes | |
| Scale of intervention (if implemented) | Local National International | |
| Other notes |
Since the scoping review aims to analyze the content and scope of the frameworks regarding the target groups and upstream actions, the data extraction consists of three steps and has two purposes: 1) to identify which frameworks are used in the literature and for which evaluation data may be available; and 2) to add to the listed frameworks that have not yet been reported in the literature. Therefore, the data extraction follows three steps:
All frameworks, guidelines, and recommendations found in the literature are extracted by name. Information is also extracted from the frameworks found in the literature on whether the framework has been evaluated, e.g. study design, sample size, intervention used and effects.
The list with the names of the frameworks, guidelines, and recommendations is made available to the expert groups, who are asked to complete it based on their knowledge.
All mentioned frameworks, guidelines and recommendations are searched manually, and the content is extracted from the officially accessible documents. The experts are asked to extract the content for frameworks, guidelines, and recommendations they suggested in languages the author group cannot cover. Data will be collected on the framework’s objectives, legal quality, reach, target audience, and proposed actions to achieve the objectives.
This will provide an overview of the existing frameworks and information on the already evaluated frameworks, with detailed information on evaluation.
Research synthesis
Results will be synthesized based on the extraction sheet presented related to the review questions and objectives. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe the body of evidence. First, the sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions, will be summarized narratively and with a flow diagram. Further details will be shown, such as publication year, legal quality (law, recommendation, guideline, strategies), level of validity (national/international), and target group to whom the frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies are addressed, will be conducted. Further, the specifications of tobacco products are addressed in the frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies reported.
The following items are used to answer the scoping review questions:
What is the extent of literature available on maternal tobacco prevention and cessation frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies at the international and national levels?
What are the recurring core elements and characteristics identified within maternal tobacco prevention and cessation frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, and strategies across different sources?
What overarching themes can be extracted from the maternal tobacco prevention and cessation literature, and where do gaps in the literature exist?
Various forms of visualization, such as tables and charts, will be used to group the results based on the data we have found. Boundaries for the visualization will depend on the actual extracted evidence.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths include that the methodology follows the international review standards of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and an expert survey supplements the systematic literature search. Limitations that we encountered during the preparation of the scoping review will be mentioned (for example, not all frameworks could be found because we do not have an expert from every country in the world and not all frameworks are named in the scientific literature). For example, tobacco prevention and control frameworks, guidelines, recommendations, or strategies, in national language only, which are not covered by experts of the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) – Oral Health, Tobacco Control, and the Women, Adolescent, and Children’s Workgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
The scoping review will serve as a stepping-stone to creating a policy resolution with the expertise of the WFPHA Oral Health, Tobacco Control, and the Women, Adolescent, and Children’s Working Group. The collaboration will create a policy resolution on ‘Maternal Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Recommendations for Primary Care Providers and Dental Providers’, which will be forwarded to the WFPHA General Council and the General Assembly to disseminate to the member Public Health Associations. Ultimately, this recommendation will be considered by each national public health association for integration into their maternal health strategies.
Supplementary Material
Click here for additional data file.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their appreciation and immense gratitude to the World Federation of Public Health Associations Oral Health, Tobacco Control, and Women, Adolescent, and Children’s Workgroup members.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. K.P. Nagdeo reports that since the initial planning of the work the APC will be reimbursed by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA and that in the past 36 months was supported with a Conference Travel Award from the World Federation of Public Health Associations, Geneva, Switzerland and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. H. Lee reports that since the initial planning of the work this work was supported for English editing from Seoul National University and that in the past 36 months had a Leadership or fiduciary role in Oral Health Workgroup paid or unpaid from World Federation of Public Health Association.
FUNDING
There was no source of funding for this research.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT
Ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this study.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization Tobacco. Accessed July 31, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco .
2. National Institute on Drug Abuse Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products DrugFacts. Accessed September 24, 2023. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/cigarettes-other-tobacco-products .
3. Havard A, Chandran JJ, Oei JL. Tobacco use during pregnancy. Addiction. 2022;117(6):1801–1810. doi: 10.1111/add.15792.
4. US Food and Drug Administration . Listing of Ingredients in Tobacco Products: Guidance for Industry. US Food and Drug Administration; 2018. Accessed March 17, 2023. https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101734143-pdf .
5. Fried ND, Gardner JD. Heat-not-burn tobacco products: an emerging threat to cardiovascular health. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319(6):H1234–H1239. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00708.2020.
6. Lange S, Probst C, Rehm J, Popova S. National, regional, and global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(7):e769–e776. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30223-7.
7. Caleyachetty R, Tait CA, Kengne AP, Corvalan C, Uauy R, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB. Tobacco use in pregnant women: analysis of data from Demographic and Health Surveys from 54 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(9):e513–e520. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70283-9.
8. Gould GS, Patten C, Glover M, Kira A, Jayasinghe H. Smoking in pregnancy among Indigenous women in high-income countries: a narrative review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(5):506–517. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw288.
9. Schneider S, Schütz J. Who smokes during pregnancy? A systematic literature review of population-based surveys conducted in developed countries between 1997 and 2006. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(2):138–147. doi: 10.1080/13625180802027993.
10. Riaz M, Lewis S, Naughton F, Ussher M. Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018;113(4):610–622. doi: 10.1111/add.14135.
11. World Health Organization New brief outlines devastating harms from tobacco use and exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke during pregnancy and throughout childhood - Report calls for protective policies. Accessed September 24, 2023. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-03-2021-new-brief-outlines-devastating-harms-from-tobacco-use-and-exposure-to-second-hand-tobacco-smoke-during-pregnancy-and-throughout-childhood .
12. Almeida R, Barbosa C, Pereira B, Diniz M, Baena A, Conde A. Tobacco smoking during pregnancy: women’s perception about the usefulness of smoking cessation interventions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116595.
13. Rodriguez D. Tobacco and nicotine use in pregnancy: Cessation strategies and treatment options. UpToDate. Accessed September 24, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/tobacco-and-nicotine-use-in-pregnancy-cessation-strategies-and-treatment-options .
14. Botelho J, Mascarenhas P, Viana J, et al. An umbrella review of the evidence linking oral health and systemic noncommunicable diseases. Nature Communications. 2022;13(1):7614. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35337-8.
15. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Middleton P, Esposito M, Glenny AM. Treating periodontal disease for preventing adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD005297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005297.pub3.
16. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Francetti L, Weinstein R, Ferrazzi E. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring potential association. Quintessence Int. 2016;47(3):193–204. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a34980.
17. Merchant AT, Sutherland MW, Liu J, Pitiphat W, Dasanayake A. Periodontal treatment among mothers with mild to moderate periodontal disease and preterm birth: reanalysis of OPT trial data accounting for selective survival. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(5):1670–1678. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy089.
18. Bobetsis YA, Kotsikoris I, Liapis CD, et al. Association between periodontal disease and vulnerable plaque morphology in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020;30:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100601.
19. Avşar TS, McLeod H, Jackson L. Health outcomes of smoking during pregnancy and the postpartum period: an umbrella review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03729-1.
20. Liu B, Xu G, Sun Y, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking before and during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: A dose-response analysis of 25 million motherinfant pairs. PLoS Med. 2020 Aug;17(8):e1003158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003158.
21. Philips EM, Santos S, Trasande L, et al. Changes in parental smoking during pregnancy and risks of adverse birth outcomes and childhood overweight in Europe and North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 229,000 singleton births. PLoS Med. 2020;17(8):e1003182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003182.
22. Marufu TC, Ahankari A, Coleman T, Lewis S. Maternal smoking and the risk of still birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1552-5.
23. DiFranza JR, Lew RA. Effect of maternal cigarette smoking on pregnancy complications and sudden infant death syndrome. J Fam Pract. 1995;40(4):385–394.
24. Burke H, Leonardi-Bee J, Hashim A, et al. Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):735–744. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2196.
25. Niemelä S, Räisänen A, Koskela J, et al. The effect of prenatal smoking exposure on daily smoking among teenage offspring. Addiction. 2017;112(1):134–143. doi: 10.1111/add.13533.
26. England LJ, Kim SY, Tomar SL, et al. Non-cigarette tobacco use among women and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010;89(4):454–464. doi: 10.3109/00016341003605719.
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E-Cigarettes and Pregnancy. Accessed September 24, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/substance-abuse/e-cigarettes-pregnancy.htm#:~:text=Although%20the%20aerosol%20of%20e,developing%20baby’s%20brain%20and%20lungs .
28. Passey ME, Adams C, Paul C, Atkins L, Longman JM. Improving implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in pregnancy care: development of an intervention to address system, maternity service leader and clinician factors. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00235-5.
29. McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(2):156–170. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156.
30. Herberts C, Sykes C. Midwives’ perceptions of providing stop-smoking advice and pregnant smokers’ perceptions of stop-smoking services within the same deprived area of London. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(1):67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00072.x.
31. Naughton F, Vaz LR, Coleman T, et al. Interest in and use of smoking cessation support across pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(7):1178–1186. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz151.
32. Passey ME, Sanson-Fisher RW. Provision of antenatal smoking cessation support: a survey with pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(6):746–749. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv019.
33. Flemming K, McCaughan D, Angus K, Graham H. Qualitative systematic review: barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation experienced by women in pregnancy and following childbirth. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(6):1210–1226. doi: 10.1111/jan.12580.
34. Oncken CA, Dietz PM, Tong VT, et al. Prenatal tobacco prevention and cessation interventions for women in low- and middle-income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(4):442–453. doi: 10.3109/00016341003678450.
35. The Joanna Briggs Institute The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Accessed September 24, 2023. https://reben.com.br/revista/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Scoping.pdf .
36. Every Woman Every Child . The Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (2016-2030) Every Woman Every Child; 2015.
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Click here for additional data file.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.