MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.21624

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2010

Retroauricular hairline approach for excision of second branchial cleft cysts: a preliminary experience.

LeBert Brad, Weiss Sean, Johnson Jonas, Walvekar Rohan

Клинический случайСтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report our preliminary experience with a retroauricular hairline incision (RAHI) for excision of second branchial cleft cysts (SBCC) and to present a relevant literature review.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of two consecutive patients diagnosed with SBCC who underwent surgical removal via a RAHI. Relevant demographic, clinicopathological, and radiological data was recorded. A web-based search was conducted to identify relevant scientific literature on "retroauricular hairline incision /approach" in order to present a systematic review of current literature.

RESULT: In both cases, the SBCC (6.0 cm and 3.8 cm) could be safely excised without major complications. One patient developed a temporary hypoesthesia of ear lobe. None of the patients had a postoperative infection, hematoma, spillage of cyst fluid, or necrosis of the skin flap. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the procedure (100%). The incisions healed well without any evidence of hair loss or keloid formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the RAHI offers an excellent surgical outcome and cosmetic result with no proven increased risks to the patients who require surgical excision of a benign SBCC.

Для цитирования: LeBert Brad, Weiss Sean, Johnson Jonas, Walvekar Rohan. Retroauricular hairline approach for excision of second branchial cleft cysts: a preliminary experience.. The Laryngoscope. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21624.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.