MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.06.010

Медицинская библиотека · Urologic oncology · 2026

Comparative effectiveness of intravesical gemcitabine vs. sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Moyer Jacob A, Ashraf Mahnoor, Mi Lanyu, Zganjar Andrew J, Lyon Timothy D, Shah Paras H, Boorjian Stephen A, Tyson Mark D

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce) are increasingly used for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), especially in the setting of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage or failure. However, the contribution of docetaxel to gemcitabine remains unquantified. We compared the effectiveness of gemcitabine alone vs. Gem/Doce in high-risk NMIBC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 296 patients treated with gemcitabine (n = 173) or Gem/Doce (n = 123) at 3 Mayo Clinic sites between 2018 and 2023. The primary outcome was high-grade recurrence-free survival (HGRFS). Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free, progression-free, cystectomy-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival and adverse events. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression with 2-stage residual inclusion to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

Median HGRFS was similar between groups (gemcitabine: 22.6 months; Gem/Doce: 19.5 months [P = 0.25]). Among patients with BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ (n = 49), median HGRFS was comparable (gemcitabine: 12.2 months; Gem/Doce: 7.6 months [P = 0.12]). No significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes. In the 2-stage residual inclusion analysis, Gem/Doce was not associated with improved HGRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.65-1.82; P = 0.80), including among patients with BCG-unresponsive disease (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 0.96-5.24 [P = .06]). Low-grade adverse events were common (gemcitabine: 63%; Gem/Doce: 55% [P = 0.19]), but grade ≥3 adverse events were rare (2.3% vs. 2.4%). Limitations included imbalances in maintenance utilization (gemcitabine: 19%; Gem/Doce: 40%), baseline characteristics, gemcitabine dosing, and follow-up duration between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, Gem/Doce was not associated with improved outcomes compared with gemcitabine alone. Prospective trials are needed to quantify the specific contribution of docetaxel in NMIBC.

Для цитирования: Moyer Jacob A, Ashraf Mahnoor, Mi Lanyu, Zganjar Andrew J, Lyon Timothy D, Shah Paras H, Boorjian Stephen A, Tyson Mark D. Comparative effectiveness of intravesical gemcitabine vs. sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.. Urologic oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.06.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.