Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
Deep learning algorithm enables lower limb venous thrombosis detection with CT venography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shen Shanshan, Yang Haixiao, Wang Pengchao, Zhang Jing, Zhen Jiahao, Liu Tao
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Lower limb computed tomography venography (CTV) has low success rates for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis. This study applied deep learning to improve DVT identification.
METHODS: Our study enrolled 119 positive DVT and 40 negative DVT, 111 positive pulmonary embolism (PE) patients and 20 negative PE. Two algorithms were evaluated: Faster R-CNN trained directly on CTV images, and YOLO11-nano pre-trained on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) then optimized on CTV via transfer learning. Three radiologists (3-5 years' experience) independently interpreted CTV images. Diagnostic performance was compared.
RESULTS: The YOLO11-nano model and Faster R-CNN achieved over 97% accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing PE. Compared to the three radiologists in diagnosing DVT, YOLO also had an excellent accuracy (92.1%) and sensitivity (93.9%), superior to Faster R-CNN (66% accuracy, 68% sensitivity). The YOLO model exceeded 77% accuracy in pelvic and femoral-popliteal segments and 66.7% in detecting calf segment thrombi.
DISCUSSION: The CTPA-based transfer learning model significantly improved the feasibility of this method in routine CTV diagnostic performance, offering a promising approach for simultaneous PE and DVT detection.
METHODS: Our study enrolled 119 positive DVT and 40 negative DVT, 111 positive pulmonary embolism (PE) patients and 20 negative PE. Two algorithms were evaluated: Faster R-CNN trained directly on CTV images, and YOLO11-nano pre-trained on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) then optimized on CTV via transfer learning. Three radiologists (3-5 years' experience) independently interpreted CTV images. Diagnostic performance was compared.
RESULTS: The YOLO11-nano model and Faster R-CNN achieved over 97% accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing PE. Compared to the three radiologists in diagnosing DVT, YOLO also had an excellent accuracy (92.1%) and sensitivity (93.9%), superior to Faster R-CNN (66% accuracy, 68% sensitivity). The YOLO model exceeded 77% accuracy in pelvic and femoral-popliteal segments and 66.7% in detecting calf segment thrombi.
DISCUSSION: The CTPA-based transfer learning model significantly improved the feasibility of this method in routine CTV diagnostic performance, offering a promising approach for simultaneous PE and DVT detection.