Histomorphometry and sperm quality in male rats exposed to 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zelenetz Andrew D, Gordon Leo I, Abramson Jeremy S, Advani Ranjana H, Andreadis Babis, Bartlett Nancy L, Budde L Elizabeth, Caimi Paolo F, Chang Julie E, Christian Beth, DeVos Sven, Dholaria Bhagirathbhai, Fayad Luis E, Habermann Thomas M, Hamid Muhammad Saad, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri Francisco, Hu Boyu, Karimi Yasmin, Kelsey Christopher R, King Rebecca, Kline Justin, Krivacic Susan, LaCasce Ann S, Landsburg Daniel, Lim Megan, Messmer Marcus, Rabinovitch Rachel, Ramakrishnan Praveen, Reid Erin, Roberts Kenneth B, Saeed Hayder, Saito Naoyuki G, Smith Stephen D, Swinnen Lode J, Tuscano Joseph, Vose Julie M, Dwyer Mary, Sundar Hema
Аннотация
ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have documented the effect of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure on the testes and sperm quality. Nevertheless, detailed histological alterations of other male reproductive organs are underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate detailed histological alterations of the testes, epididymis, seminal vesicle, coagulating organ and sperm parameters following 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure. Eighteen adult male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 18) were equally divided into three groups (n = 6): control, 4 h and 24 h groups. The groups were exposed to an active router daily for 4 or 24 h, respectively. The control group was sham-exposed using an inactive router. The exposure lasted for 8 weeks at a 20 cm distance, with a power density of 0.141 W/m2 and a specific absorption rate of 0.41 W/Kg. Histological findings revealed vacuolation in the testes and the corpus epididymis of the 4 and 24 h groups. The seminal vesicle in both exposed groups exhibited multifocal atypical hyperplasia. Besides, the seminiferous tubule diameter decreased gradually in both exposed groups, with a substantial decrease in the 24 h group. The spermatogenesis index in 4 and 24 h groups also reduced significantly. The latter result was reflected in the sperm concentration, where both groups showed a significant reduction compared to the control group. Sperm motility also decreased significantly in the 4 h groups. Interestingly, there was a substantial increase in sperm viability in the 24 h group. These findings indicate that 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure causes changes in the histology and histomorphometry measurement and impairs important sperm parameters. This highlights the consequences following Wi-Fi exposure on male reproductive health.