A model-based selection of oral cancer patient for passive scattering proton beam therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To identify patients with oral cancer (OC) who benefit from proton therapy versus photon therapy using a model-based approach (MBA) to reduce late adverse events.

MATERIAL/

METHODS

Passive scattering proton beam therapy (PSPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were established for 40 patients with OC, consisting of a dose of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 35 fractions. At least 95% of the planning target volume received 95% of the prescribed dose, and the dose to the organs at risk was restricted to be as low as possible. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was used to estimate the risk of late adverse events, including dysgeusia, xerostomia and osteoradionecrosis of the mandible. Patients who were considered as candidates for PSPT were selected if the NTCP difference between both plans (ΔNTCP) exceeded the threshold defined in the Dutch national indication protocol.

RESULTS

PSPT reduced the doses to the spinal cord, pharynx, oral cavity and contralateral salivary glands compared with VMAT. PSPT was also superior for the risk evaluation of each late adverse event calculated by incorporating dose metrics and patient baseline risk factors. For the MBA using ΔNTCP and the thresholds, PSPT was indicated in 24 of the 40 cases, and the remaining 16 cases were considered to be equivalent to VMAT.

CONCLUSION

MBA was used to select OC cases that were candidates for PSPT. Compared with VMAT, the risk of expected late adverse events was significantly reduced with PSPT, and 60% of patients were considered eligible for PSPT.