Urology · 2025
Outcomes Following Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty Gender Affirming Surgery With Urethral Lengthening: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.
СтатьяConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blasdel Gaines, Chen Mang L, Berli Jens, Dy Geolani, Dugi Daniel, Djordjevic Miroslav, Bizic Marta, Zhao Lee, Schechter Loren, Santucci Richard, Myers Jeremy B, Goodwin Isak, Nikolavsky Dmitriy, Meltzer Toby, Watt Andrew, Pariser Joseph, Figler Brad, Kuzon William, Hadj-Moussa Miriam, McCormick Benjamin, Brown Lee K, Nigriny John F, Moses Rachel A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To generate surgeon consensus on metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery outcomes statements using a modified Delphi method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We invited metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery surgeons to anonymously participate in a two-round web-based Delphi survey to generate consensus on patient centered outcome statements generated from surgeon practice patterns, literature review, and patient input. Consensus was predefined as at least 70% agreement. Surgeons were asked to provide open ended feedback on statements which were thematically analyzed and used to revise statements not reaching consensus for a second-round survey.
RESULTS: Twenty-one metoidioplasty and phalloplasty surgeons were invited and 16 (76%) reviewed 39 statements in round one and 17/20 (85%) reviewed 10 statements in round two. Following round two, nearly all statements reached consensus: 14/15 (93%) of statements on metoidioplasty, 11/12 (92%) of radial forearm phalloplasty statements and 12/12 (100%) of anterolateral thigh phalloplasty statements. We found that 12/12 (100%) statements on sexual health, 8/8 (100%) statements on nonurinary complications, and 16/18 (89%) statements on urinary outcomes met consensus.
CONCLUSION: In a modified web-based Delphi survey, surgeons reached consensus on nearly all outcome statements. Variations in surgeon experience, length of follow up, and reporting of outcomes contribute to different definitions of urinary complications. Results from this study will help create decision making tools for individuals considering metoidioplasty and phalloplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We invited metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery surgeons to anonymously participate in a two-round web-based Delphi survey to generate consensus on patient centered outcome statements generated from surgeon practice patterns, literature review, and patient input. Consensus was predefined as at least 70% agreement. Surgeons were asked to provide open ended feedback on statements which were thematically analyzed and used to revise statements not reaching consensus for a second-round survey.
RESULTS: Twenty-one metoidioplasty and phalloplasty surgeons were invited and 16 (76%) reviewed 39 statements in round one and 17/20 (85%) reviewed 10 statements in round two. Following round two, nearly all statements reached consensus: 14/15 (93%) of statements on metoidioplasty, 11/12 (92%) of radial forearm phalloplasty statements and 12/12 (100%) of anterolateral thigh phalloplasty statements. We found that 12/12 (100%) statements on sexual health, 8/8 (100%) statements on nonurinary complications, and 16/18 (89%) statements on urinary outcomes met consensus.
CONCLUSION: In a modified web-based Delphi survey, surgeons reached consensus on nearly all outcome statements. Variations in surgeon experience, length of follow up, and reporting of outcomes contribute to different definitions of urinary complications. Results from this study will help create decision making tools for individuals considering metoidioplasty and phalloplasty.