International journal of hematology · 2026
Impact of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ishii Keita, Suzuki Kazuhito, Gunji Tadahiro, Fukushima Ryoko, Ishii Hiroto, Uryu Hideki, Yamauchi Hirofumi, Tsukamoto Kurumi, Hirano Kei, Nagao Riku, Nakamura Takashi, Saito Takeshi, Nishiwaki Kaichi, Yano Shingo
Аннотация
The diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) has been identified as a prognostic factor in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its significance in relapsed or refractory DLBCL (R/R DLBCL) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DTI on survival outcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL. We reviewed the medical records of patients with R/R DLBCL who received second-line therapy. DTI at relapse or refractory disease (r/r DTI) was defined as the time from radiological diagnosis-to-treatment initiation, with a cut-off of 28 days. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A total of 184 patients with R/R DLBCL were included. Patients with short r/r DTI had significantly worse OS than those with long r/r DTI (1-year OS: 50.4% vs. 79.5%; P < 0.001). Short r/r DTI was associated with adverse clinical features, including poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and high International Prognostic Index at relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that short r/r DTI was independently associated with significantly inferior OS (HR 1.77; P = 0.043). In conclusion, DTI is an independent prognostic factor in R/R DLBCL and can be considered in patient selection for clinical trials.