Blood · 2025
Impact of ASXL1 at diagnosis in patients with CML receiving frontline potent TKIs: high risk of kinase domain mutations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shanmuganathan Naranie, Yeung David T, Wadham Carol, Fernandes Adelina, Maqsood Muneeza, Shahrin NurHezrin, Saunders Verity, Kenyon Rosalie R, Lin Ming, Toubia John, McConnell Joe, Kaczorowski Dominic, Ross David M, Yong Agnes S M, Chee Lynette, Shortt Jake, Viiala Nicholas, Braley Jodi, Kok Chung Hoow, Hughes Timothy P, Branford Susan
Аннотация
Genomic profiling in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) demonstrated somatic variants in blood cancer-related gene variants (CGVs) and rearrangements associated with the formation of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-associated rearrangements) at diagnosis, collectively termed additional genetic abnormalities (AGAs). AGAs had a negative impact on failure-free survival (FFS) and molecular response in imatinib-treated patients. We investigated whether treatment with more potent therapies could overcome the negative impact of AGAs at diagnosis. Targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing was performed on diagnostic samples of 315 patients consecutively enrolled in 4 clinical trials of frontline potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in CP-CML. AGAs were present in 34% of patients at diagnosis, including 20% harboring CGVs and 18% with Ph-associated rearrangements (4% had both). Although the negative impact of Ph-associated rearrangements was overcome by more potent inhibitors, patients with CGVs continued to experience inferior outcomes. This result was largely attributable to patients with ASXL1 variants, observed in 7% overall. Patients harboring ASXL1 variants also had inferior outcomes compared with those with wild-type ASXL1 in terms of 12-month major molecular response (55% vs 83%; P = .001), 2-year FFS (61% vs 91%; P < .001), and notably, the development of treatment-emergent BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations at 2 years (35% vs 1%; P < .001). In multivariable models, both CGVs and ASXL1 variants were predictors of each outcome. Treatment with frontline potent TKIs overcame the negative impact of Ph-associated rearrangements observed with frontline imatinib. However, inferior outcomes were still associated with the presence of CGVs. The acquisition of TKI-resistant BCR::ABL1 mutations was almost exclusively associated with mutated ASXL1 at diagnosis.