MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.007

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2022

External validation of COMPASS and BIOSCOPE prognostic scores in colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Tonello Marco, Baratti Dario, Sammartino Paolo, Di Giorgio Andrea, Robella Manuela, Sassaroli Cinzia, Framarini Massimo, Valle Mario, Macrì Antonio, Graziosi Luigina, Fugazzola Paola, Lippolis Piero Vincenzo, Gelmini Roberta, Biacchi Daniele, Kasamura Shigeki, Deraco Marcello, Cenzi Carola, Del Bianco Paola, Vaira Marco, Sommariva Antonio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The selection of patients undergoing cytoreductive- surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is crucial. BIOSCOPE and COMPASS are prognostic scores designed to stratify survival into four classes according to clinical and pathological features. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of these scores using a large cohort of patients as an external reference.

METHODS

Overall survival analysis was performed using Log-Rank and Kaplan-Meier curves for each score. The probability of survival at 12, 36, and 60 months was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

From the validation cohort of 437 patients, the analysis included 410 patients in the COMPASS group and 364 patients in the BIOSCOPE group (100% data completeness). We observed a different patient distribution between classes (high-risk for BIOSCOPE compared to COMPASS, p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, both COMPASS and BIOSCOPE effectively stratified overall survival (Log-Rank, p = 0.0001 in both cases), with a lack of discrimination between COMPASS classes II and III (p = n.s.). COMPASS at 12 m and BIOSCOPE at 60 m showed the best performance in terms of survival prediction (AUC of 0.82 and 0.81). The specificity of the two tests is good (median 81.3%), whereas sensibility is quite low (median 64.2%).

CONCLUSION

Following external validation in a large population of patients with CRC-PM who are eligible for surgery, the COMPASS and BIOSCOPE scores exhibit high inter-test variability but effectively stratify cancer-related mortality risk. While the quality of the scores is similar, BIOSCOPE shows better inter-tier differentiation, suggesting that tumor molecular classification could improve test discrimination capability. More powerful stratification scores with the inclusion of novel predictors are needed.

Для цитирования: Tonello Marco, Baratti Dario, Sammartino Paolo, Di Giorgio Andrea, Robella Manuela, Sassaroli Cinzia, Framarini Massimo, Valle Mario, Macrì Antonio, Graziosi Luigina, Fugazzola Paola, Lippolis Piero Vincenzo, Gelmini Roberta, Biacchi Daniele, Kasamura Shigeki, Deraco Marcello, Cenzi Carola, Del Bianco Paola, Vaira Marco, Sommariva Antonio. External validation of COMPASS and BIOSCOPE prognostic scores in colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.