Periodontology 2000 · 2026
Long-term outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation: A machine-learning analysis, systematic review, and meta-analysis of predictive factors.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sabri Hamoun, Saleh Muhammad H A, Nava Paolo, Scaini Riccardo, Testori Tiziano, Del Fabbro Massimo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To quantify long-term (≥ 5 years) implant survival after lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) and to identify clinical predictors of long-term survival using conventional and machine-learning meta-analytic techniques.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. Randomized trials, prospective or retrospective studies with ≥ 10 patients and ≥ 5-year follow-up were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB-2 (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (observational studies); certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE approach. A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis (logit-transformed proportions) estimated pooled survival while accounting for clustering of multiple implants per patient. Moderator effects were explored by mixed-effects meta-regression. A MetaForest machine-learning model examined non-linear interactions among predictive factors.
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (48 cohorts) involving 7,902 implants and ≈ 2,800 patients met the criteria (3 RCTs, 7 prospective non-randomized, and 22 retrospective studies; follow-up 5-13 years). Pooled long-term survival was 95.8 % (95 % CI: 94.5-96.8 %); Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 82.8 %) but fell to 53.2 % in MetaForest residuals. Meta-regression identified lower survival with Graftless procedures versus allografts(β = 1.11, p = 0.016), autografts(β =2.40, p = 0.005), Xenografts(β =1.53, p = 0.04), Xenografts+Allografts(β =1.55, p = 0.04) and Xenografts+Autografts(β =1.82, p = 0.03) with no significant difference versus Alloplasts. Residual bone height (RBH) < 4 mm (β = -0.53, p = 0.039) as well as smoking prevalence (1.96 % per 10 % increase, p = 0.009) reduced survival. MetaForest ranked smoking, age, RBH, follow-up duration and membrane use as the principal predictors; barrier membranes mitigated the negative effect in smokers and in low-RBH sites. Time-to-failure analysis of 205 failed implants showed 59 % of losses within the first year and 96 % by year 5. Overall certainty of evidence was low.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed after LSFE exhibit high 5-13-year survival (96 %). Use of bone graft materials and their mixtures yield more favorable outcomes compared to Graftless protocol, whereas RBH < 4 mm and smoking significantly impair implant survival. Barrier-membrane coverage is advisable for smokers and short-RBH sites. Despite the long-term nature of this review (≥5 years of follow-up), most failures occur within the first three years of function, underscoring the need for intensified monitoring during this early phase.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. Randomized trials, prospective or retrospective studies with ≥ 10 patients and ≥ 5-year follow-up were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB-2 (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (observational studies); certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE approach. A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis (logit-transformed proportions) estimated pooled survival while accounting for clustering of multiple implants per patient. Moderator effects were explored by mixed-effects meta-regression. A MetaForest machine-learning model examined non-linear interactions among predictive factors.
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (48 cohorts) involving 7,902 implants and ≈ 2,800 patients met the criteria (3 RCTs, 7 prospective non-randomized, and 22 retrospective studies; follow-up 5-13 years). Pooled long-term survival was 95.8 % (95 % CI: 94.5-96.8 %); Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 82.8 %) but fell to 53.2 % in MetaForest residuals. Meta-regression identified lower survival with Graftless procedures versus allografts(β = 1.11, p = 0.016), autografts(β =2.40, p = 0.005), Xenografts(β =1.53, p = 0.04), Xenografts+Allografts(β =1.55, p = 0.04) and Xenografts+Autografts(β =1.82, p = 0.03) with no significant difference versus Alloplasts. Residual bone height (RBH) < 4 mm (β = -0.53, p = 0.039) as well as smoking prevalence (1.96 % per 10 % increase, p = 0.009) reduced survival. MetaForest ranked smoking, age, RBH, follow-up duration and membrane use as the principal predictors; barrier membranes mitigated the negative effect in smokers and in low-RBH sites. Time-to-failure analysis of 205 failed implants showed 59 % of losses within the first year and 96 % by year 5. Overall certainty of evidence was low.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed after LSFE exhibit high 5-13-year survival (96 %). Use of bone graft materials and their mixtures yield more favorable outcomes compared to Graftless protocol, whereas RBH < 4 mm and smoking significantly impair implant survival. Barrier-membrane coverage is advisable for smokers and short-RBH sites. Despite the long-term nature of this review (≥5 years of follow-up), most failures occur within the first three years of function, underscoring the need for intensified monitoring during this early phase.