The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
Robot-Assisted Ileal Ureter Replacement: Comparisons Between Totally Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Segment Preparation.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Pan, Huang Cong, Wang Xiang, Yang Jiyu, Zhang Yiming, Li Zhihua, Li Xinfei, Fan Shubo, Zhu Hongjian, Zhou Liqun, Zhang Kai, Yang Kunlin, Li Xuesong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The comparative perioperative outcomes of totally intracorporeal robot-assisted ileal ureteral replacement (TI-RAIUR) versus that of RAIUR with extracorporeal ileal segment preparation (RAIUR-EI) remain undefined. This study pioneers a comparative analysis between these approaches to guide clinical individualised therapy.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent RAIUR (22 via RAIUR-EI and 12 via TI-RAIUR) were included. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were systematically compared.
RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics. The RAIUR-EI approach significantly reduced the reoperation time for initial failed procedures. Both groups achieved 100% 1-year subjective success and stable long-term renal function. The complication rates were statistically similar, although one Clavien-Dindo III incisional hernia occurred in the RAIUR-EI group. In addition, the TI-RAIUR approach demonstrated better aesthetic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques achieve reliable outcomes for long-segment ureteral reconstruction. The RAIUR-EI approach may optimise efficiency in more complex cases, whereas the TI-RAIUR technique results in better aesthetic outcomes.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent RAIUR (22 via RAIUR-EI and 12 via TI-RAIUR) were included. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were systematically compared.
RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics. The RAIUR-EI approach significantly reduced the reoperation time for initial failed procedures. Both groups achieved 100% 1-year subjective success and stable long-term renal function. The complication rates were statistically similar, although one Clavien-Dindo III incisional hernia occurred in the RAIUR-EI group. In addition, the TI-RAIUR approach demonstrated better aesthetic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques achieve reliable outcomes for long-segment ureteral reconstruction. The RAIUR-EI approach may optimise efficiency in more complex cases, whereas the TI-RAIUR technique results in better aesthetic outcomes.