Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
Uterine closure techniques during cesarean delivery and placenta accreta spectrum incidence in subsequent pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petrecca Alessandro, Gomez Julie, Raymond Megan, Tersigni Chiara, Berghella Vincenzo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multiple uterine closure techniques during cesarean delivery (CD) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) incidence in the following pregnancy.
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed Central, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov were electronically searched from their inception to September 2025.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included all studies with a control population that compared different uterine closure techniques during CD-namely (1) type of suture; (2) inclusion or not of the decidua; (3) continuous versus interrupted suture; (4) locking versus non-locking suture; (5) pursed-string or not; (6) single- versus double-layer suture-with PAS incidence at the following pregnancy.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was PAS incidence at the following pregnancy.
RESULTS: We could not find any controlled study with follow-up data for PAS at the subsequent pregnancy in terms of type of suture utilized, inclusion or not of the decidua, or pursed-string closure at index CD. Three trials, including 1787 pregnancies, were analyzed and judged as "high quality," showing a potential association between continuous versus interrupted suture and PAS, but no difference with respect to locking versus non-locking or single- versus double-layer closures.
CONCLUSIONS: As of now, it is impossible to mandate a specific uterine closure technique during CD with the aim of reducing the incidence of PAS at the following pregnancy. Large randomized controlled trials are needed.
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed Central, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov were electronically searched from their inception to September 2025.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included all studies with a control population that compared different uterine closure techniques during CD-namely (1) type of suture; (2) inclusion or not of the decidua; (3) continuous versus interrupted suture; (4) locking versus non-locking suture; (5) pursed-string or not; (6) single- versus double-layer suture-with PAS incidence at the following pregnancy.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was PAS incidence at the following pregnancy.
RESULTS: We could not find any controlled study with follow-up data for PAS at the subsequent pregnancy in terms of type of suture utilized, inclusion or not of the decidua, or pursed-string closure at index CD. Three trials, including 1787 pregnancies, were analyzed and judged as "high quality," showing a potential association between continuous versus interrupted suture and PAS, but no difference with respect to locking versus non-locking or single- versus double-layer closures.
CONCLUSIONS: As of now, it is impossible to mandate a specific uterine closure technique during CD with the aim of reducing the incidence of PAS at the following pregnancy. Large randomized controlled trials are needed.