In Vivo Comparison of Branched vs Linear Pegylation of a Capsule-Degrading Enzyme for Treatment of Anthrax.
Аннотация
Polymers of d-glutamic acid (PDGA) form capsules of virulent strains of Bacillus anthracis. PDGA is antiphagocytic and weakly immunogenic; it enables the bacteria to evade innate immune responses. Capsule depolymerase (CapD) catalyzes the covalent anchoring of PDGA to the cell wall. There has been interest in developing CapD as a therapeutic to treat antibiotic-resistant anthrax infections. We previously showed that a His-tagged and circularly permuted (CP) CapD modified with a branched 3-prong polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule termed PEG-CapDS334C-CP could protect mice with 80% survival against a 5 LD50 challenge with virulent B. anthracis. In the current study, we compare the efficacy of tag-free CapDS334C-CP modified by either the branched 3-prong or a linear 1-prong PEG. Pharmacokinetic studies in mice showed the branched 3-prong PEG-CapDS334C-CP has a slightly higher, but not statistically different, total exposure in animals than the linear 1-prong PEG variant. The T max of the 1-prong PEG-CapDS334C-CP was 8 times shorter than the 3-prong. Mice infected with spore doses of 10 and 100 LD50, treated 24 h after infection every 8 h for 7 days, were protected by both the 3-prong (10 LD50: p = 0.0051; 100 LD50: p = 0.0463, log-rank analysis) and 1-prong (10 LD50: p = 0.0009; 100 LD50: p < 0.0001, log-rank analysis) PEG-CapDS334C-CP when compared with control animals. A second iteration similarly showed statistically significant protection by both variants at both challenge doses, and the combined data from both experiments showed no significant difference in efficacy between the 1- and 3-prong enzymes confirming that tag-free PEG-CapDS334C-CP is protective against experimental anthrax infection.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.