Patient-Reported Outcomes of Split-Thickness Skin Grafts for Floor of Mouth Cancer Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) on quality of life (QOL) for early-stage floor of mouth carcinoma (FOM-CA) undergoing surgical resection and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) reconstruction have not been established. We have performed a cross-sectional QOL analysis of such patients to define functional postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with pathologic stage T1/T2 FOM-CA who underwent resection and STSG reconstruction at a tertiary academic cancer center reported outcomes with the University of Washington QOL (v4) questionnaire after at least 6 months since surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-four out of 49 eligible patients completed questionnaires with a mean follow-up of 41 months (range: 6-88). Subsites of tumor involvement/resection included the following: (1) lateral FOM (L-FOM) (n = 17), (2) anterior FOM (A-FOM) (n = 4), and (3) alveolar ridge with FOM, all of whom underwent lateral marginal mandibulectomy (MM-FOM) (n = 3). All patients reported swallowing scores of 70 ("I cannot swallow certain solid foods") or better. Ninety-six percent (23/24) reported speech of 70 ("difficulty saying some words, but I can be understood over the phone") or better. A-FOM patients reported worse chewing than L-FOM patients (mean: 50.0 vs. 85.3; p = 0.01). All 4 A-FOM patients reported a low chewing score of 50 ("I can eat soft solids but cannot chew some foods"). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between subsite groups in swallowing, speech, or taste.

CONCLUSION

STSG reconstructions for pathologic T1-T2 FOM-CA appear to result in acceptable PROM QOL outcomes with the exception of A-FOM tumors having worse chewing outcomes.