Circumcision, Buried Penis and Obesity in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients with Penile Cancer.

INTRODUCTION

We reviewed patient demographics and body morphology in a contemporary cohort of patients presenting to a tertiary care center for treatment of penile cancer.

METHODS

The University of Iowa Oncology Registry was retrospectively reviewed for cases of penile cancer managed between 2006 and 2016. The database was queried for cancer specific details, followed by a chart review for body morphology data and comorbidity status.

RESULTS

We treated 54 patients for penile cancer in the study period with a mean ± SD age of 64.3 ± 12.9 years and body mass index of 36.2 ± 10 kg/m2. Of these men 31.5% (17) had a clinically buried penis and 50% (27) reported prepubertal circumcision. Patients with a buried penis had a higher body mass index (46.53 ± 10.6 vs 31.48 ± 5.63 kg/m2, p <0.0001) and underwent fewer inguinal lymph node dissections (20% vs 58%, p = 0.05) than patients without a buried penis, but had similar rates of higher stage (2-4) presentation. Stage correlated with penile cancer death. Those with cancer specific mortality had a significantly higher body mass index (41.2 ± 12.4 kg/m2) vs those without penile cancer death (34.6 ± 9.1 kg/m2).

CONCLUSIONS

Penile cancer remains relatively rare but contemporary cohorts suggest that circumcision may no longer be protective, especially in the setting of a clinically buried penis that may mimic an intact prepuce. How a buried penis and higher body mass index affect presentation, clinical management, surgical outcomes and disease course deserves further study.