MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology · 2008

[Splenic irradiation as a successful treatment for an elderly patient with B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia].

Nakashima Hidetoshi, Saito Bungo, Ariizumi Hirotsugu, Matsuda Isao, Nakamaki Tsuyoshi, Tomoyasu Shigeru

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a case of B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (B-PLL) that was treated successfully with splenic irradiation (SI). An 86-year-old man underwent a medical examination for lumbago and general fatigue at another hospital in June 2007. A compressed lumbar fracture and splenomegaly were found using computed tomography (CT). Thereafter, the patient consulted our hospital because of leukocytosis. Peripheral blood showed hemoglobin level 9.8 g/dl and white blood cell count 38.1x10(9)/l with 91% atypical cells. Surface marker analysis demonstrated that atypical cells were positive for CD20, CD22, FMC7, surface IgM, surface IgD and kappa, but were negative for CD5, TdT and lambda. The morphology of these cells was compatible with prolymphocytes with prominent nucleoli and condensed nuclear chromatin. A diagnosis of B-PLL was made. SI (total dose 20 Gy) was chosen for the treatment and a single course of SI was very effective without causing any significant adverse events. This case demonstrates that SI may remain valuable for the treatment of B-PLL in an elderly patient.

Для цитирования: Nakashima Hidetoshi, Saito Bungo, Ariizumi Hirotsugu, Matsuda Isao, Nakamaki Tsuyoshi, Tomoyasu Shigeru. [Splenic irradiation as a successful treatment for an elderly patient with B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia].. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology. 2008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.