Head & neck · 2026
Antegrade Versus Retrograde Facial Nerve Dissection in Benign Parotid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Do Hyun, Jang David W, Hwang Se Hwan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Parotidectomy for benign tumors requires meticulous facial nerve preservation, yet the optimal dissection technique between anterograde dissection (AD) and retrograde dissection (RD) remains uncertain, prompting this updated meta-analysis comparing their outcomes.
METHODS: Twenty-one studies (1632 patients) were included. Outcomes comprised operative parameters, postoperative complications, and facial nerve recovery. Pooled effects were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: RD significantly reduced transient facial nerve palsy versus AD (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98), with no difference in permanent palsy. Recovery was similar at 1, 6, and 12 months, although AD showed faster recovery at 3 months. Other complications were comparable. RD was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and smaller resected tissue volume. Subgroup analysis indicated reduced transient palsy mainly in superficial parotidectomy.
CONCLUSION: RD offers advantages over AD, particularly in superficial parotidectomy, though further randomized trials are warranted.
METHODS: Twenty-one studies (1632 patients) were included. Outcomes comprised operative parameters, postoperative complications, and facial nerve recovery. Pooled effects were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: RD significantly reduced transient facial nerve palsy versus AD (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98), with no difference in permanent palsy. Recovery was similar at 1, 6, and 12 months, although AD showed faster recovery at 3 months. Other complications were comparable. RD was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and smaller resected tissue volume. Subgroup analysis indicated reduced transient palsy mainly in superficial parotidectomy.
CONCLUSION: RD offers advantages over AD, particularly in superficial parotidectomy, though further randomized trials are warranted.