Surgical endoscopy · 2026
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: lesion detection and surgical outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han Fengjie, Wang Qingqing, Shu Guiming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is used during minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), but disease-specific evidence is limited and has often mixed patient-level and lesion-level outcomes.
METHODS: Six databases were searched to May 14, 2026. We prespecified lesion-detection and surgical-outcome modules. Primary quantitative analyses required fully separable CRLM numerators and denominators. Patient-level and lesion-level R0 outcomes were analyzed separately. Random-effects logit models used Paule-Mandel variance and Hartung-Knapp 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diagnostic studies were assessed with QUADAS-2 and surgical cohorts with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Eighteen eligible reports represented 17 unique cohorts; one earlier report was excluded from quantitative synthesis because its cohort was nested in a later study. Patient-level R0 resection was reported in four studies (146/155 patients) and pooled at 92.5% (95% CI 62.7-98.9%; I2 = 71.3%). Lesion-level R0 resection was reported in four studies (424/455 lesions) and pooled at 93.0% (95% CI 83.2-97.3%; I2 = 25.3%). Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) occurred in 20/354 patients across four CRLM-specific cohorts, with a pooled proportion of 6.2% (95% CI 3.1-11.8%; I2 = 0%). Six studies reported fluorescence-positive proportions for CRLM lesions ranging from 59.6 to 95.6%; these were not pooled because reference standards and outcome definitions differed. The only controlled comparison reported higher lesion-level R0 with ICG (odds ratio 5.65, 95% CI 1.02-31.48), but was small and retrospective.
CONCLUSIONS: ICG fluorescence imaging is feasible for lesion visualization and margin-oriented navigation in selected CRLM patients at experienced centers. Evidence remains insufficient to establish comparative benefit over conventional minimally invasive resection. Adequately powered randomized trials with standardized ICG and intraoperative-ultrasonography protocols and patient-centered oncologic outcomes are essential.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD420261394514.
METHODS: Six databases were searched to May 14, 2026. We prespecified lesion-detection and surgical-outcome modules. Primary quantitative analyses required fully separable CRLM numerators and denominators. Patient-level and lesion-level R0 outcomes were analyzed separately. Random-effects logit models used Paule-Mandel variance and Hartung-Knapp 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diagnostic studies were assessed with QUADAS-2 and surgical cohorts with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: Eighteen eligible reports represented 17 unique cohorts; one earlier report was excluded from quantitative synthesis because its cohort was nested in a later study. Patient-level R0 resection was reported in four studies (146/155 patients) and pooled at 92.5% (95% CI 62.7-98.9%; I2 = 71.3%). Lesion-level R0 resection was reported in four studies (424/455 lesions) and pooled at 93.0% (95% CI 83.2-97.3%; I2 = 25.3%). Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) occurred in 20/354 patients across four CRLM-specific cohorts, with a pooled proportion of 6.2% (95% CI 3.1-11.8%; I2 = 0%). Six studies reported fluorescence-positive proportions for CRLM lesions ranging from 59.6 to 95.6%; these were not pooled because reference standards and outcome definitions differed. The only controlled comparison reported higher lesion-level R0 with ICG (odds ratio 5.65, 95% CI 1.02-31.48), but was small and retrospective.
CONCLUSIONS: ICG fluorescence imaging is feasible for lesion visualization and margin-oriented navigation in selected CRLM patients at experienced centers. Evidence remains insufficient to establish comparative benefit over conventional minimally invasive resection. Adequately powered randomized trials with standardized ICG and intraoperative-ultrasonography protocols and patient-centered oncologic outcomes are essential.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD420261394514.