Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 1998
Endometrial ablation with a vaporizing electrode. II. Clinical outcome of a pilot study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vercellini P, Oldani S, De Giorgi O, Milesi M, Merlo D, Crosignani P G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: As a vaporizing electrode has been successfully used to treat submucous myomas, we evaluated its safety and efficacy in performing endometrial ablation.
METHODS: Forty consecutive women with established menorrhagia with (n=26) and without (n=14) submucous myomas were enrolled in a prospective, noncomparative, pilot study. Hysteroscopic endometrial vaporization was performed with pure cutting current set at 200 watts.
RESULTS: All procedures were completed without complications. Median (interquartile range, IQR) fluid deficit was 90 (0-200) ml and median (IQR) operating time 10 (7-12.5) min. A significant correlation was observed between operating time and fluid absorption (Spearman's test by ranks, r=0.47; p=0.002). The degree of difficulty of the operation was classified as none on 28 (70%) occasions, mild on 11 (27.5%) and moderate on one (2.5%). After a mean+/-s.d. follow-up of 20.3+/-2.4 months, amenorrhea or spotting were reported by 23 (57.5%) subjects, hypomenorrhea by 10 (25%), normal flows by six (15%), and menorrhagia by one (2.5%). The median (IQR) menstrual score calculated according to a pictorial blood loss assessment chart dropped from 282.5 (199-383) to 0 (0-15) (p<0.0001). Six (15%) subjects were very satisfied with the effect of surgery, 30 (75%) satisfied, two (5%) uncertain, one (2.5%) dissatisfied and one (2.5%) very dissatisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: The vaporizing electrode seems to combine the benefits of the cutting loop (speed, efficacy and possibility of removing myomas) and the roller-ball electrode (safety and limited fluid absorption) while avoiding their respective disadvantages, and may be considered an interesting alternative in the hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia.
METHODS: Forty consecutive women with established menorrhagia with (n=26) and without (n=14) submucous myomas were enrolled in a prospective, noncomparative, pilot study. Hysteroscopic endometrial vaporization was performed with pure cutting current set at 200 watts.
RESULTS: All procedures were completed without complications. Median (interquartile range, IQR) fluid deficit was 90 (0-200) ml and median (IQR) operating time 10 (7-12.5) min. A significant correlation was observed between operating time and fluid absorption (Spearman's test by ranks, r=0.47; p=0.002). The degree of difficulty of the operation was classified as none on 28 (70%) occasions, mild on 11 (27.5%) and moderate on one (2.5%). After a mean+/-s.d. follow-up of 20.3+/-2.4 months, amenorrhea or spotting were reported by 23 (57.5%) subjects, hypomenorrhea by 10 (25%), normal flows by six (15%), and menorrhagia by one (2.5%). The median (IQR) menstrual score calculated according to a pictorial blood loss assessment chart dropped from 282.5 (199-383) to 0 (0-15) (p<0.0001). Six (15%) subjects were very satisfied with the effect of surgery, 30 (75%) satisfied, two (5%) uncertain, one (2.5%) dissatisfied and one (2.5%) very dissatisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: The vaporizing electrode seems to combine the benefits of the cutting loop (speed, efficacy and possibility of removing myomas) and the roller-ball electrode (safety and limited fluid absorption) while avoiding their respective disadvantages, and may be considered an interesting alternative in the hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia.