Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
Comparative analysis of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for assessing tubal patency in women with endometriosis-related infertility: a propensity score-matched study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tian Wencai, Xie Baoli, Liang Feng, Huang Yingqin, Hu Qianwen, Yu Jiaxin, Qin Aiping
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical pregnancy rates of hysterosalpingography (HSG) with water-based contrast and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) to investigate their impact on fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis-related infertility.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 296 women with endometriosis-related infertility, aged 18-39, undergoing HSG or HyCoSy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (January 2020-June 2022). Propensity score matching was applied to balance demographic and clinical variables. Clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The HSG group showed a higher clinical pregnancy rates compared to the HyCoSy group. Logistic regression demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 0.41 (95% CI 0.20-0.82, p < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy in the HyCoSy group compared to HSG. After propensity score matching, the OR was 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.75). Similar results were observed across multivariable and IPTW analyses, suggesting that HSG may be associated with better clinical pregnancy outcomes than HyCoSy.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) with water-based contrast appears to be associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates compared to HyCoSy in women with endometriosis-related infertility. This suggests that HSG may be a more favorable diagnostic method for optimizing fertility outcomes, though further research is needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 296 women with endometriosis-related infertility, aged 18-39, undergoing HSG or HyCoSy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (January 2020-June 2022). Propensity score matching was applied to balance demographic and clinical variables. Clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The HSG group showed a higher clinical pregnancy rates compared to the HyCoSy group. Logistic regression demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 0.41 (95% CI 0.20-0.82, p < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy in the HyCoSy group compared to HSG. After propensity score matching, the OR was 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.75). Similar results were observed across multivariable and IPTW analyses, suggesting that HSG may be associated with better clinical pregnancy outcomes than HyCoSy.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) with water-based contrast appears to be associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates compared to HyCoSy in women with endometriosis-related infertility. This suggests that HSG may be a more favorable diagnostic method for optimizing fertility outcomes, though further research is needed to confirm these findings.