Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
Clinical significance of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the classification of thymic tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gao Jian, Wang Si-Yang, Ao Yong-Qiang, Jiang Jia-Hao, Lin Miao, Wang Shuai, Shi Hong-Cheng, Ding Jian-Yong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the possibility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) in identifying histological classification of thymic tumours.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed as thymic tumours and accepted PET-CT scans were included. Thymic tumours were classified into three subgroups: low-risk thymoma (A, AB and B1), high-risk thymoma (B2, B3) and thymic carcinoma (TC). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential factors differentiating the classification of thymic tumours. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to assess the diagnosis efficiency and the cut-off value.
RESULTS: From 2015 to 2023, a total of 176 patients, including 75 cases of low-risk thymoma, 60 cases of high-risk thymoma and 41 cases of TC, were included. The logistic regression models suggested maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as a potential factor differentiating the three subgroups. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve identified the SUVmax in differentiating low-risk thymoma vs high-risk thymoma (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.845, 95% CI: 0.776-0.913, specificity: 0.907, sensitivity: 0.716), low-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.976, 95% CI: 0.953-0.999, specificity: 0.933, sensitivity: 0.951) and high-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.761-0.92, specificity: 0.865, sensitivity: 0.703), respectively. SUVmax was also an independent factor identifying thymic tumours with or without lymph node metastasis. The cut-off of 10 in SUVmax could well identify lymph node metastasis with the positive predict value of 0.684 and negative predict value of 0.981.
CONCLUSIONS: SUVmax is a reliable factor in distinguishing different histological subgroups and identifying lymph node metastasis in thymic tumours.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed as thymic tumours and accepted PET-CT scans were included. Thymic tumours were classified into three subgroups: low-risk thymoma (A, AB and B1), high-risk thymoma (B2, B3) and thymic carcinoma (TC). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential factors differentiating the classification of thymic tumours. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to assess the diagnosis efficiency and the cut-off value.
RESULTS: From 2015 to 2023, a total of 176 patients, including 75 cases of low-risk thymoma, 60 cases of high-risk thymoma and 41 cases of TC, were included. The logistic regression models suggested maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as a potential factor differentiating the three subgroups. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve identified the SUVmax in differentiating low-risk thymoma vs high-risk thymoma (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.845, 95% CI: 0.776-0.913, specificity: 0.907, sensitivity: 0.716), low-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.976, 95% CI: 0.953-0.999, specificity: 0.933, sensitivity: 0.951) and high-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.761-0.92, specificity: 0.865, sensitivity: 0.703), respectively. SUVmax was also an independent factor identifying thymic tumours with or without lymph node metastasis. The cut-off of 10 in SUVmax could well identify lymph node metastasis with the positive predict value of 0.684 and negative predict value of 0.981.
CONCLUSIONS: SUVmax is a reliable factor in distinguishing different histological subgroups and identifying lymph node metastasis in thymic tumours.