Clinical significance of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the classification of thymic tumors.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the possibility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) in identifying histological classification of thymic tumours.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as thymic tumours and accepted PET-CT scans were included. Thymic tumours were classified into three subgroups: low-risk thymoma (A, AB and B1), high-risk thymoma (B2, B3) and thymic carcinoma (TC). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential factors differentiating the classification of thymic tumours. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to assess the diagnosis efficiency and the cut-off value.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2023, a total of 176 patients, including 75 cases of low-risk thymoma, 60 cases of high-risk thymoma and 41 cases of TC, were included. The logistic regression models suggested maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as a potential factor differentiating the three subgroups. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve identified the SUVmax in differentiating low-risk thymoma vs high-risk thymoma (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.845, 95% CI: 0.776-0.913, specificity: 0.907, sensitivity: 0.716), low-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.976, 95% CI: 0.953-0.999, specificity: 0.933, sensitivity: 0.951) and high-risk thymoma vs TC (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.761-0.92, specificity: 0.865, sensitivity: 0.703), respectively. SUVmax was also an independent factor identifying thymic tumours with or without lymph node metastasis. The cut-off of 10 in SUVmax could well identify lymph node metastasis with the positive predict value of 0.684 and negative predict value of 0.981.

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax is a reliable factor in distinguishing different histological subgroups and identifying lymph node metastasis in thymic tumours.