Pediatric surgery international · 2021
Differences in post-operative complications after reconstruction for congenital biliary dilatation in a single institution-Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus hepaticoduodenostomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohyama Kei, Furuta Shigeyuki, Shima Hideki, Tuji Shiho, Nagae Hideki, Tanaka Kunihide, Obayashi Juma, Kawaguchi Kouhei, Kawaguchi Takuya, Nishiya Yuri, Kudou Kousuke, Kawase Kouichi, Wakisaka Munechika, Kitagawa Hiroaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The standard surgical procedure for congenital biliary dilatation (CBD) consists of excision of extrahepatic bile duct and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). However, alternative reconstructive operations for CBD includes hepaticoduodenostomy (HD). We compared postoperative complications and therapeutic outcomes of these two operations at our institution.
METHODS: From 1981 to 2009, there were 23 traceable patients who underwent operation for CBD, They were divided into an HJ Group (n = 15) and an HD Group (n = 8). Demographic and outcome data were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (cholangitis, pancreatitis, and anastomotic stenosis) and current blood test data (AST, ALT, Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Amylase) between the two groups. Current abdominal pain and carcinogenesis were not observed in either group. Intrahepatic stones occurred in one patient in each group, both > 25 years post-operation.
CONCLUSION: HD is considered to be an acceptable reconstruction method compared to HJ, based on our results. There has been a suggestion that inadequate diversion in HD might increase the risk of cholangiocarcinoma. To date, in this series, that has not happened.
METHODS: From 1981 to 2009, there were 23 traceable patients who underwent operation for CBD, They were divided into an HJ Group (n = 15) and an HD Group (n = 8). Demographic and outcome data were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (cholangitis, pancreatitis, and anastomotic stenosis) and current blood test data (AST, ALT, Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Amylase) between the two groups. Current abdominal pain and carcinogenesis were not observed in either group. Intrahepatic stones occurred in one patient in each group, both > 25 years post-operation.
CONCLUSION: HD is considered to be an acceptable reconstruction method compared to HJ, based on our results. There has been a suggestion that inadequate diversion in HD might increase the risk of cholangiocarcinoma. To date, in this series, that has not happened.