International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
The anterior cervical angle: A novel predictor of vaginal birth.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Şeker Erdal, Ümit Coşkun, Süt Hasan, Koçar Mustafa, Sarıtaş Ecem, Yıldız Gülşah Aynaoğlu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the role of anterior utero-cervical angle as a predictor of labor induction success, comparing outcomes between normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section groups.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 55 patients undergoing labor induction (46 normal vaginal delivery, 9 cesarean section). Parameters such as maternal age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), cervical length, anterior cervical angle (ACA), Bishop score, and levator ani measurements were analyzed. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher exact test, independent sample test, Mann-Whitney U test, or χ2 test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: The ACA was significantly different between normal vaginal delivery (108.02 ± 22.38°) and cesarean section (86.11 ± 26.09°) groups (P = 0.026). We determined an optimal ACA threshold of 96° for the prediction of failure of progression (sensitivity: 70%, specificity: 73%). Other significant differences included maternal weight (P = 0.0033), height (P = 0.0033), BMI (P = 0.0462), primiparity (P = 0.0161), and fetal gender (P = 0.0334). However, Bishop score, cervical length, and levator ani metrics showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Although ACA differs significantly between vaginal delivery and cesarean section groups, its independent predictive value for induction success remains limited compared with factors like primiparity and BMI. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify its clinical utility.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 55 patients undergoing labor induction (46 normal vaginal delivery, 9 cesarean section). Parameters such as maternal age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), cervical length, anterior cervical angle (ACA), Bishop score, and levator ani measurements were analyzed. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher exact test, independent sample test, Mann-Whitney U test, or χ2 test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: The ACA was significantly different between normal vaginal delivery (108.02 ± 22.38°) and cesarean section (86.11 ± 26.09°) groups (P = 0.026). We determined an optimal ACA threshold of 96° for the prediction of failure of progression (sensitivity: 70%, specificity: 73%). Other significant differences included maternal weight (P = 0.0033), height (P = 0.0033), BMI (P = 0.0462), primiparity (P = 0.0161), and fetal gender (P = 0.0334). However, Bishop score, cervical length, and levator ani metrics showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Although ACA differs significantly between vaginal delivery and cesarean section groups, its independent predictive value for induction success remains limited compared with factors like primiparity and BMI. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify its clinical utility.