BMC ophthalmology · 2020
Autoimmune retinopathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eton Emily A, Abrams Gary, Khan Naheed W, Fahim Abigail T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell dyscrasia and precursor to multiple myeloma. It has known ocular manifestations, but has not previously been shown to have an association with autoimmune retinopathy.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 57 year-old female presented with 1 year of progressive, bilateral, peripheral vision loss, photopsias, and nyctalopia. Her fundus examination and extensive ancillary testing were concerning for hereditary versus autoimmune retinopathy. The patient was found to have anti-retinal antibodies against carbonic anhydrase II and enolase proteins with a negative genetic retinal dystrophy panel. Malignancy work-up was negative, but the patient was diagnosed with MGUS, a premalignant condition. The patient was treated with immunosuppressive therapies, with rituximab demonstrating the most robust therapeutic response with respect to patient symptoms and ophthalmic testing.
CONCLUSIONS: MGUS should be considered as a potential etiology of autoimmune retinopathy in patients without other autoimmune or malignant disease processes. Immunosuppressive therapy may be helpful in limiting disease progression, with rituximab showing efficacy in retinopathy refractory to other agents.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 57 year-old female presented with 1 year of progressive, bilateral, peripheral vision loss, photopsias, and nyctalopia. Her fundus examination and extensive ancillary testing were concerning for hereditary versus autoimmune retinopathy. The patient was found to have anti-retinal antibodies against carbonic anhydrase II and enolase proteins with a negative genetic retinal dystrophy panel. Malignancy work-up was negative, but the patient was diagnosed with MGUS, a premalignant condition. The patient was treated with immunosuppressive therapies, with rituximab demonstrating the most robust therapeutic response with respect to patient symptoms and ophthalmic testing.
CONCLUSIONS: MGUS should be considered as a potential etiology of autoimmune retinopathy in patients without other autoimmune or malignant disease processes. Immunosuppressive therapy may be helpful in limiting disease progression, with rituximab showing efficacy in retinopathy refractory to other agents.