Applied nursing research : ANR · 2025
"Improving postnatal maternity care following severe perineal trauma by evaluating end-user's experiences of a pilot trial exploring laxative management; A qualitative study".
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rm R Sfreddo, Hoang V, Murphy E M A, Turner B, Juszczyk K, Barnes J, Parange A, Rm J Tucker
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Trauma to the anal sphincter following vaginal birth increases the risk of anal incontinence. Laxative management in the postnatal period is recommended to improve defecation and reduce the risk of wound breakdown. Research underpinning management guidelines is lacking and omits end-users (clinicians and birthing women) involvement in evaluating pilot studies. Incorporating end-users' enhances the relevance of the research to those being investigated, improves the design, and translation of findings into clinical practice. No studies have evaluated end-users' experiences in research which investigates laxative management following anal sphincter injury.
AIM: This study identifies the barriers and facilitators in a pilot study research design and suggests improvements to inform larger scale research to improve clinical practice.
METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was adopted. Purposeful sampling of health professionals (n = 85) involved in the direct care of women following OASIs and women (n = 64) sustaining OASIs during the recent pilot trial. Data analysis employing thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: The consensus from interviews (n = 23) highlighted the research was feasible with suggested improvements to enhance future recruitment, information for linguistically diverse women and review of quality-of-life tools. The evaluation process enhanced future research engagement.
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of future research can be improved adopting a qualitative framework and end-users' to evaluate pilot studies. Findings from this pilot study identified issues including recruitment, CALD participant information and accuracy of QoL data collection tools that needed to be addressed enhancing future findings that are relevant to the needs of the study population and enhance translation into practice.
AIM: This study identifies the barriers and facilitators in a pilot study research design and suggests improvements to inform larger scale research to improve clinical practice.
METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was adopted. Purposeful sampling of health professionals (n = 85) involved in the direct care of women following OASIs and women (n = 64) sustaining OASIs during the recent pilot trial. Data analysis employing thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: The consensus from interviews (n = 23) highlighted the research was feasible with suggested improvements to enhance future recruitment, information for linguistically diverse women and review of quality-of-life tools. The evaluation process enhanced future research engagement.
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of future research can be improved adopting a qualitative framework and end-users' to evaluate pilot studies. Findings from this pilot study identified issues including recruitment, CALD participant information and accuracy of QoL data collection tools that needed to be addressed enhancing future findings that are relevant to the needs of the study population and enhance translation into practice.