Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry · 2020
The Assessment of Skeletal Muscle and Cortical Bone by Second-generation HR-pQCT at the Tibial Midshaft.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hildebrand Kurt N, Sidhu Karamjot, Gabel Leigh, Besler Bryce A, Burt Lauren A, Boyd Steven K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is the current densitometric gold-standard for assessing skeletal muscle at the 66% proximal tibia site. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a leading technology for quantifying bone microarchitecture at the distal extremities, and with the second-generation HR-pQCT it is possible to measure proximal limb sites. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of using HR-pQCT to assess skeletal muscle parameters at the 66% proximal tibia site, and (2) test HR-pQCT skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility at this site.
METHODS: Adult participants (9 males; 7 females; ages 31-75) received 1 pQCT scan and 2 HR-pQCT scans at the 66% proximal site of the nondominant tibia. Participants were repositioned between HR-pQCT scans to test reproducibility. HR-pQCT and pQCT scans were analyzed to quantify muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle density. Coefficients of determination and Bland-Altman plots compared muscle parameters between pQCT and HR-pQCT. For short-term reproducibility, root-mean-square of coefficient of variance and least significant change were calculated.
RESULTS: HR-pQCT and pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA were positively correlated (R2 = 0.66, R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001, respectively). Muscle density was equivalent between HR-pQCT and pQCT; however, there was systematic and directional bias for muscle CSA, such that muscle CSA was 11% lower with HR-pQCT and bias increased with larger muscle CSA. Root-mean-square of coefficient of variance was 0.67% and 0.92% for HR-pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively, while least significant change was 1.4 mg/cm3 and 174.0 mm2 for muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively.
CONCLUSION: HR-pQCT is capable of assessing skeletal muscle at the 66% site of the tibia with good precision. Measures of muscle density are comparable between HR-pQCT and pQCT.
METHODS: Adult participants (9 males; 7 females; ages 31-75) received 1 pQCT scan and 2 HR-pQCT scans at the 66% proximal site of the nondominant tibia. Participants were repositioned between HR-pQCT scans to test reproducibility. HR-pQCT and pQCT scans were analyzed to quantify muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle density. Coefficients of determination and Bland-Altman plots compared muscle parameters between pQCT and HR-pQCT. For short-term reproducibility, root-mean-square of coefficient of variance and least significant change were calculated.
RESULTS: HR-pQCT and pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA were positively correlated (R2 = 0.66, R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001, respectively). Muscle density was equivalent between HR-pQCT and pQCT; however, there was systematic and directional bias for muscle CSA, such that muscle CSA was 11% lower with HR-pQCT and bias increased with larger muscle CSA. Root-mean-square of coefficient of variance was 0.67% and 0.92% for HR-pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively, while least significant change was 1.4 mg/cm3 and 174.0 mm2 for muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively.
CONCLUSION: HR-pQCT is capable of assessing skeletal muscle at the 66% site of the tibia with good precision. Measures of muscle density are comparable between HR-pQCT and pQCT.