European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2025
Long-term functional outcomes after Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled (TTSS) anastomosis for rectal cancer measured by electronic Patients Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs).
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Foppa Caterina, Maroli Annalisa, Carvello Michele, La Raja Carlotta, Luberto Antonio, Zangrandi Federico, Rocca Maria, Spinelli Antonino
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS) is gaining interest as a reconstructive technique whenever a restorative procedure after a total mesorectal excision (TME) is planned. TTSS, allowing lower anastomoses than the conventional DS technique, may raise discussion about its functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare long-term functional outcomes of TTSS and DS techniques performed after TME for rectal cancer (RC).
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, two-parallel cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure after TME for RC with either TTSS or DS approach were included. The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) questionnaire was delivered at 6, 12, and 24 months after stoma closure through a web link embedded in a Short Message System (SMS) or email using an electronic system (Esosphera Srl).
RESULTS: According to sample size calculation, 116 patients (58 per cohort) were included. No difference in the LARS score was found at 6 and 12 months, while a significantly lower median LARS was reported in TTSS cohort at 24 months (p = 0.034). The rate of patients with LARS and LARS sub-domains were comparable except for a lower fractioning in TTSS at 24 months (p = 0.005). Anastomoses in the TTSS cohort were significantly lower (p = 0.027), anastomotic leak rate was higher in the DS (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Although lower anastomoses in TTSS cohort, functional outcomes were not inferior of those after DS technique.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, two-parallel cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure after TME for RC with either TTSS or DS approach were included. The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) questionnaire was delivered at 6, 12, and 24 months after stoma closure through a web link embedded in a Short Message System (SMS) or email using an electronic system (Esosphera Srl).
RESULTS: According to sample size calculation, 116 patients (58 per cohort) were included. No difference in the LARS score was found at 6 and 12 months, while a significantly lower median LARS was reported in TTSS cohort at 24 months (p = 0.034). The rate of patients with LARS and LARS sub-domains were comparable except for a lower fractioning in TTSS at 24 months (p = 0.005). Anastomoses in the TTSS cohort were significantly lower (p = 0.027), anastomotic leak rate was higher in the DS (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Although lower anastomoses in TTSS cohort, functional outcomes were not inferior of those after DS technique.