Academic radiology · 2025
Computed Tomography Radiomics-based Combined Model for Predicting Thymoma Risk Subgroups: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yifei, Luo Chao, Wu Yongshun, Zhou Shumin, Ruan Guangying, Li Haojiang, Chen Wanyuan, Lin Yi, Liu Lizhi, Quan Tingting, He Xiaodong
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurately distinguishing histological subtypes and risk categorization of thymomas is difficult. To differentiate the histologic risk categories of thymomas, we developed a combined radiomics model based on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) radiomics, clinical, and semantic features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 360 patients with pathologically-confirmed thymomas who underwent CT examinations were retrospectively recruited from three centers. Patients were classified using improved pathological classification criteria as low-risk (LRT: types A and AB) or high-risk (HRT: types B1, B2, and B3). The training and external validation sets comprised 274 (from centers 1 and 2) and 86 (center 3) patients, respectively. A clinical-semantic model was built using clinical and semantic variables. Radiomics features were filtered using intraclass correlation coefficients, correlation analysis, and univariate logistic regression. An optimal radiomics model (Rad_score) was constructed using the AutoML algorithm, while a combined model was constructed by integrating Rad_score with clinical and semantic features. The predictive and clinical performances of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic/calibration curve analyses and decision-curve analysis, respectively.
RESULTS: Radiomics and combined models (area under curve: training set, 0.867 and 0.884; external validation set, 0.792 and 0.766, respectively) exhibited performance superior to the clinical-semantic model. The combined model had higher accuracy than the radiomics model (0.79 vs. 0.78, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. The original_firstorder_median of venous phase had the highest relative importance among features in the radiomics model.
CONCLUSION: Radiomics and combined radiomics models may serve as noninvasive discrimination tools to differentiate thymoma risk classifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 360 patients with pathologically-confirmed thymomas who underwent CT examinations were retrospectively recruited from three centers. Patients were classified using improved pathological classification criteria as low-risk (LRT: types A and AB) or high-risk (HRT: types B1, B2, and B3). The training and external validation sets comprised 274 (from centers 1 and 2) and 86 (center 3) patients, respectively. A clinical-semantic model was built using clinical and semantic variables. Radiomics features were filtered using intraclass correlation coefficients, correlation analysis, and univariate logistic regression. An optimal radiomics model (Rad_score) was constructed using the AutoML algorithm, while a combined model was constructed by integrating Rad_score with clinical and semantic features. The predictive and clinical performances of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic/calibration curve analyses and decision-curve analysis, respectively.
RESULTS: Radiomics and combined models (area under curve: training set, 0.867 and 0.884; external validation set, 0.792 and 0.766, respectively) exhibited performance superior to the clinical-semantic model. The combined model had higher accuracy than the radiomics model (0.79 vs. 0.78, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. The original_firstorder_median of venous phase had the highest relative importance among features in the radiomics model.
CONCLUSION: Radiomics and combined radiomics models may serve as noninvasive discrimination tools to differentiate thymoma risk classifications.