Spinal cord · 2026
Experiences and perceptions of participants, therapists and stakeholders about the intervention provided as part of the early and intensive motor training trial for people with SCI: a qualitative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chu Jackie, Glinsky Joanne V, Liu Hueiming, Rimmer Christine, Roberts Sharon, Tamburella Federica, Lincoln Claire, Denis Sophia, Chen Lydia W, Rainey Donna, Jørgensen Vivien, van der Lede Jessica, van Laake-Geelen Charlotte C M, McDonald Mark, Gollan Emilie J, Paddison Sue, Bell Chris, Oostra Kristine, Van Roey Lot, Ben Marsha, Tranter Keira E, Scivoletto Giorgio, Spooren Annemie I, Stolwijk Janneke K, Harvey Lisa A
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study.
OBJECTIVES: To explore participants', therapists' and stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of the trial intervention provided as part of the Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI-MT Trial). The intervention involved 12 h per week of task specific training supplemented with strength training.
SETTINGS: Fifteen spinal injury units across Europe and Australia.
METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted including 20 with trial participants, 16 with trial therapists and 4 with stakeholders. Interview questions were framed around the Implementation Research Logic Model and the interview guide was developed by the research team. Inductive and deductive thematic analyses were done iteratively. Trustworthiness was ensured through four criteria (credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability).
RESULTS: Three themes were identified from these interviews, (i) the trial intervention was well received by participants and therapists, (ii) there were strengths and challenges to providing the trial intervention according to its key principles, and (iii) participants, therapists and stakeholders differed in what they felt the trial needed to demonstrate to justify the future rollout of the trial intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: There were many features of the intervention provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial that both participants and therapists valued even though the trial results indicated no therapeutic benefit. Consideration should be given to how some of these features could be better incorporated into usual care to improve patient satisfaction and engagement.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000091808.
UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBER: U1111-1264-1689.
OBJECTIVES: To explore participants', therapists' and stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of the trial intervention provided as part of the Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI-MT Trial). The intervention involved 12 h per week of task specific training supplemented with strength training.
SETTINGS: Fifteen spinal injury units across Europe and Australia.
METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted including 20 with trial participants, 16 with trial therapists and 4 with stakeholders. Interview questions were framed around the Implementation Research Logic Model and the interview guide was developed by the research team. Inductive and deductive thematic analyses were done iteratively. Trustworthiness was ensured through four criteria (credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability).
RESULTS: Three themes were identified from these interviews, (i) the trial intervention was well received by participants and therapists, (ii) there were strengths and challenges to providing the trial intervention according to its key principles, and (iii) participants, therapists and stakeholders differed in what they felt the trial needed to demonstrate to justify the future rollout of the trial intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: There were many features of the intervention provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial that both participants and therapists valued even though the trial results indicated no therapeutic benefit. Consideration should be given to how some of these features could be better incorporated into usual care to improve patient satisfaction and engagement.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000091808.
UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBER: U1111-1264-1689.