MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25259/sni_682_2023

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2023

Preoperatively difficult-to-diagnose medulla oblongata germinoma: A case report and literature review.

Karita Hiroki, Koiso Takao, Muroi Ai, Sakamoto Noriaki, Zaboronok Alexander, Ishikawa Eiichi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intracranial germinomas are rare tumors, accounting for 0.5-2% of primary intracranial neoplasms. While they typically occur in the pineal gland, suprasellar region, basal ganglia, and thalamus, germinomas arising in the medulla oblongata are exceptionally rare. Diagnosis of medulla oblongata germinoma is challenging, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and poor prognosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a case of a 29-year-old man complaining of left leg numbness. Radiological findings revealed a contrast-enhanced lesion in the medulla oblongata. The patient underwent tumor biopsy, and intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IOD) suspected the diagnosis of medulla oblongata germinoma. He underwent chemoradiotherapy after confirming the diagnosis of germinoma. Intracranial germinoma arising in the medulla oblongata differs from germinomas in other locations due to its higher incidence in individuals in their 20s and a slight female predominance.

CONCLUSION

When encountering lesions in the medulla oblongata, germinoma should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses, and surgical strategies including IOD should be planned accordingly.

Для цитирования: Karita Hiroki, Koiso Takao, Muroi Ai, Sakamoto Noriaki, Zaboronok Alexander, Ishikawa Eiichi. Preoperatively difficult-to-diagnose medulla oblongata germinoma: A case report and literature review.. Surgical neurology international. 2023. DOI: 10.25259/sni_682_2023.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.