Annals of surgical oncology · 2020
Impact of Perioperative Steroid Administration in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Onoe Shunsuke, Yokoyama Yukihiro, Ebata Tomoki, Igami Tsuyoshi, Mizuno Takashi, Yamaguchi Junpei, Watanabe Nobuyuki, Suzuki Shogo, Nishiwaki Kimitoshi, Ando Masahiko, Nagino Masato
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To date, five randomized controlled trials have assessed the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration in hepatectomy; however, all of these studies involved a substantial number of 'minor' hepatectomies. The benefit of steroid administration for patients undergoing 'complex' hepatectomy, such as major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration for complex major hepatectomy.
METHODS: Patients with suspected hilar malignancy scheduled to undergo major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection were randomized into either the control or steroid groups. The steroid group received hydrocortisone 500 mg immediately before hepatic pedicle clamping, followed by hydrocortisone 300 mg on postoperative day (POD) 1, 200 mg on POD 2, and 100 mg on POD 3. The control group received only physiologic saline. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative liver failure.
RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were randomized to either the control (n = 46) or steroid (n = 48) groups. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics; however, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of grade B/C postoperative liver failure (control group, n = 8, 17%; steroid group, n = 4, 8%; p = 0.188) and other complications. Serum bilirubin levels on PODs 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the steroid group than those in the control group; however, these median values were within normal limits in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative steroid administration did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including liver failure following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection.
METHODS: Patients with suspected hilar malignancy scheduled to undergo major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection were randomized into either the control or steroid groups. The steroid group received hydrocortisone 500 mg immediately before hepatic pedicle clamping, followed by hydrocortisone 300 mg on postoperative day (POD) 1, 200 mg on POD 2, and 100 mg on POD 3. The control group received only physiologic saline. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative liver failure.
RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were randomized to either the control (n = 46) or steroid (n = 48) groups. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics; however, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of grade B/C postoperative liver failure (control group, n = 8, 17%; steroid group, n = 4, 8%; p = 0.188) and other complications. Serum bilirubin levels on PODs 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the steroid group than those in the control group; however, these median values were within normal limits in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative steroid administration did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including liver failure following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection.