Khirurgiia · 2020
Long-term results of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gurmikov B N, Vishnevsky V A, Kovalenko Yu A, Chzhao A V
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma depending tumor dimensions, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, cellular differentiation and quality of resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 46 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer. Extended hemihepatectomy was made in 14 patients (30.4%), resection of two and three liver segments - in 17 cases (36.9%), standard hemihepatectomy - in 15 patients (32.6%). Liver resection was combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection in 5 (10.9%) patients. Liver resection was followed by biopsy of specimens. Dimension and number of tumors, differentiation grade, resection margin, liver capsule invasion, vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases were analyzed. Forty-four (95.6%) patients were followed-up in long-term postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.2 (Dell Inc., USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 (IBM Corp., USA) software package. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 software.
RESULTS: Median survival was 37 months, 1-year - 75.9% (60.9-90.9%), 3-year - 57.6% (35.5-79.6%), 5-year - 36% (8.2-63.7%). Median survival after R1 resection was 37 months, R2 resection - 12 months. Median survival was not achieved in R0 group. We found significant differences in overall survival depending on quality of resection. Tumor dimension over 5 cm, low-grade adenocarcinoma, microvascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with impaired postoperative survival. However, differences were not significant.
CONCLUSION: The main surgical strategy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be ensuring microscopically negative resection margin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 46 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer. Extended hemihepatectomy was made in 14 patients (30.4%), resection of two and three liver segments - in 17 cases (36.9%), standard hemihepatectomy - in 15 patients (32.6%). Liver resection was combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection in 5 (10.9%) patients. Liver resection was followed by biopsy of specimens. Dimension and number of tumors, differentiation grade, resection margin, liver capsule invasion, vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases were analyzed. Forty-four (95.6%) patients were followed-up in long-term postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.2 (Dell Inc., USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 (IBM Corp., USA) software package. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 software.
RESULTS: Median survival was 37 months, 1-year - 75.9% (60.9-90.9%), 3-year - 57.6% (35.5-79.6%), 5-year - 36% (8.2-63.7%). Median survival after R1 resection was 37 months, R2 resection - 12 months. Median survival was not achieved in R0 group. We found significant differences in overall survival depending on quality of resection. Tumor dimension over 5 cm, low-grade adenocarcinoma, microvascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with impaired postoperative survival. However, differences were not significant.
CONCLUSION: The main surgical strategy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be ensuring microscopically negative resection margin.