Urolithiasis · 2024
Intelligent control of pressure based on ureteral access sheaths: renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscope perfusion at different sites.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yongming Huang, Jin Kuang, Xin Huang, Dong Cheng Tie, Leming Song, Xiaolin Deng
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of renal pelvic pressure (RPP) control during flexible ureteroscopic perfusion at various sites.
METHODS: Flexible ureteroscopy for the intelligent control of RPP was based on a ureteral access sheath (UAS) that integrated pressure measurement and suction functions (with automatic adjustment). Eleven consecutive patients with indurating nephrostomy tubes were enrolled. The nephrostomy tube was connected to a disposable invasive blood pressure sensor. The RPP was zeroed after the pressure stabilized. The flow rate and control value were set at 100 ml/min and - 5 mmHg, respectively. An 8.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope was irrigated at the renal pelvis, as well as the upper, middle, and lower calyces of the kidney for 1 min.
RESULTS: All 11 patients with upper urinary tract calculi underwent successful UAS placement. Pressures measured by the sheath and fistula during perfusion were - 5.07 ± 1.41 and - 4.89 ± 1.07 mmHg at the renal pelvis, -5.16 ± 1.36 and - 5.12 ± 1.32 mmHg at the upper calyces, -4.98 ± 0.87 and - 5.39 ± 1.01 mmHg at the middle calyces, as well as -4.95 ± 1.56 and - 5.64 ± 1.24 mmHg at the lower calyces, respectively. There were no significant differences in pressure between the sheath and fistula groups or in sheath and fistula pressures among parts. The RPP fluctuated; however, all values were within the safe limit of 20 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: The UAS-based pressure monitoring technology can accurately and reliably monitor and control RPP within a set range.
METHODS: Flexible ureteroscopy for the intelligent control of RPP was based on a ureteral access sheath (UAS) that integrated pressure measurement and suction functions (with automatic adjustment). Eleven consecutive patients with indurating nephrostomy tubes were enrolled. The nephrostomy tube was connected to a disposable invasive blood pressure sensor. The RPP was zeroed after the pressure stabilized. The flow rate and control value were set at 100 ml/min and - 5 mmHg, respectively. An 8.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope was irrigated at the renal pelvis, as well as the upper, middle, and lower calyces of the kidney for 1 min.
RESULTS: All 11 patients with upper urinary tract calculi underwent successful UAS placement. Pressures measured by the sheath and fistula during perfusion were - 5.07 ± 1.41 and - 4.89 ± 1.07 mmHg at the renal pelvis, -5.16 ± 1.36 and - 5.12 ± 1.32 mmHg at the upper calyces, -4.98 ± 0.87 and - 5.39 ± 1.01 mmHg at the middle calyces, as well as -4.95 ± 1.56 and - 5.64 ± 1.24 mmHg at the lower calyces, respectively. There were no significant differences in pressure between the sheath and fistula groups or in sheath and fistula pressures among parts. The RPP fluctuated; however, all values were within the safe limit of 20 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: The UAS-based pressure monitoring technology can accurately and reliably monitor and control RPP within a set range.