Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to compare the micromotion of various tibial reconstruction strategies including short cemented and long cementless stems with or without metaphyseal augmentation.

METHODS

A moderate tibial bone defect was milled into dual density polyurethane test blocks. Mechanical testing was performed on 4 test constructs: (1) short cemented stem (75-mm total length) alone; (2) short cemented stem with a symmetric metaphyseal cone; (3) a press-fit (175-mm total length) diaphyseal engaging tibial construct without a cone, and (4) the same press-fit tibial construct with a metaphyseal cone augment. Micromotion of the baseplate/cone construct with respect to the tibia block was measured during a stair descent loading profile for 10,000 cycles. The peak-to-peak micromotion of these various tibial constructs was compared. Unpaired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in peak-to-peak micromotion among the various tibial constructs tested. An analysis of variance was performed for final validation.

RESULTS

The cemented short stem demonstrated similar varus/valgus displacement, internal/external rotation, compression, and lift-off micromotion values under loading compared to a cementless long stem. A tibial cone improved compression and lift-off micromotion for both cemented and cementless constructs. A short 50-mm cemented stem with a cone demonstrated a lower micromotion at the anterior SI location compared to a press-fit 150-mm cementless stem without a tibial cone.

CONCLUSIONS

A short cemented tibial component with a cone achieved similar micromotion during simulated stair descent compared to a cementless diaphyseal press-fit implant in cases of moderate tibial defects.